JAMA & ARCHIVES
JAMA & Archives
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  EMBARGOED CONTENT  PAST ISSUES  EVENTS  HELP  SEARCH RELEASES

July 1, 2003

JAMA news releases are made available to the public after 3 pm US Central time on the first 4 Tuesdays of each month. The Archives Journals news releases are made available to the public after 3 pm Central time on Mondays. We also provide a list of previous news releases.

THIS WEEK'S CONTENT

(Embargoed for Release: 3 p.m. CT, Tuesday, July 1, 2003)


JAMA NEW RELEASES

>   STUDY EXAMINES SHORTER THAN CURRENTLY RECOMMENDED INTERVAL FOR REPEAT ENDOSCOPIC COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING

>   MORE THAN ONE-THIRD OF NURSING HOME RESIDENTS WITH SEVERE COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENTS HAVE FEEDING TUBES

>   SOME MEDICATIONS INCORRECTLY PRESCRIBED FOR DIABETIC PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE

JAMA REPORT (VIDEO NEWS RELEASE SCRIPT)

>   SIGMOIDOSCOPY MAY BE MORE EFFECTIVE AT PREVENTING COLON CANCER IF DONE MORE OFTEN THAN CURRENTLY RECOMMENDED


INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THESE NEWS RELEASES IS PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT. JOURNAL ATTRIBUTION IS REQUIRED.

TV Note: This week's JAMA video news release is on the appropriate interval for endoscopic colorectal cancer screening. The release will be fed Tuesday, July 1, from 9:00 - 9:30 a.m. ET on Telstar 6, Transponder 11 (C-Band) and from 2:00 - 2:30 p.m. ET on Telstar 6, Transponder 11 (C-Band). For more information, call 312/464-JAMA (5262).

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 3 P.M. (CT), TUESDAY, JULY 1, 2003
Media Advisory: To contact Robert E. Schoen, M.D., M.P.H., call Clare Collins at 412/624-2607.
To contact editorialist Robert H. Fletcher, M.D., M.Sc., call John Lacey at 617/432-0442.


STUDY EXAMINES SHORTER THAN CURRENTLY RECOMMENDED INTERVAL FOR REPEAT ENDOSCOPIC COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING

CHICAGO—Even though the recommended interval for repeat screening flexible sigmoidoscopy (FSG) after a negative examination is five years, new research shows that a repeat FSG at three years will detect some advanced colon polyps and colon cancer, according to an article in the July 2 issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

Robert E. Schoen, M.D., M.P.H., of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, and colleagues examined the number of adenomas and cancerous lesions in the distal colon (the lower portion of the colon) found by repeat FSG 3 years after a negative examination. Most adenomas, also known as polyps, are small, benign tumors. However, adenomas can be advanced, large, or have changes in cellular makeup and give rise to colorectal cancers.

Participants for the study were drawn from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO), a randomized, controlled community-based study of cancer screening. The average age was 65.7 years at study entry (1993-1995) and 61.6 percent were men. Individuals underwent screening FSG at baseline and at 3 years. Of 11,583 eligible for repeat screening FSG 3 years after an initial negative examination, 9,317 (80.4 percent) returned.

The researchers found that a total of 1,292 returning participants (13.9 percent) had a polyp or mass detected by FSG 3 years after the initial examination. "In the distal colon, 3.1 percent (292/9,317) were found to have an adenoma or cancer. The incidence of advanced adenoma (n = 72) or cancer (n = 6) in the distal colon was 78 (0.8 percent) of 9,317. Of individuals with advanced distal adenomas detected at the year 3 examination, 80.6 percent (58/72) had lesions found in a portion of the colon that had been adequately examined at the initial sigmoidoscopy," the authors write.

"In conclusion, our results show that 3 years after a negative FSG, there is a 0.8 percent incidence of advanced adenomas or cancer detectable in the distal colon. Although the overall percentage with detected abnormalities is modest, these data raise concern about the impact of a prolonged screening interval after a negative examination," the authors conclude.
(
JAMA. 2003;290:41-48. Available post-embargo at jama.com)

Editor's Note: This study was supported by a contract from the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md.

EDITORIAL: SCREENING SIGMOIDOSCOPY

In an accompanying editorial, Robert H. Fletcher, M.D., M.Sc., of the Harvard Medical School/Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, writes that all screening tests, sigmoidoscopy included, are imperfect.

"They can improve patients' chances of a good outcome but cannot guarantee it. Screening tests are chosen because they are easier, safer, and less expensive than definitive tests, but at the cost of missing some cancers and sounding many false alarms," he writes. "Perhaps clinicians and patients tend to expect colorectal cancer screening to be more effective than it really is because some of the same tests (sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy) are used for both screening and diagnosis."

"Most colorectal cancer deaths could be prevented. Screening with current tests at currently recommended intervals would contribute substantially toward reaching this goal if applied to most of the adult population," Dr. Fletcher writes.

"In the quest for better ways to screen, clinicians should not overreact, pressing sigmoidoscopy beyond what it can reasonably do. While the results of the study by Schoen et al, as sound as they are, are not sufficient to prompt change in the currently recommended screening interval of 5 years, the findings do reveal much more about the consequences of this screening interval for cancer prevention than was known before," Dr. Fletcher concludes.
(JAMA. 2003;290:106-107). Available post-embargo at jama.com

Editor's Note: Dr. Fletcher serves on the scientific advisory board of Exact Sciences, which makes a stool DNA cancer screening test.

For More Information: Contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations Department at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or email: jamaarchmedia{at}ama-assn.org.

Go back to the top.


EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 3 P.M. (CT) TUESDAY, JULY 1, 2003
Media Advisory: To contact Susan L. Mitchell, M.D., M.P.H., call Jennifer Davis at 617/363-8384.


MORE THAN ONE-THIRD OF NURSING HOME RESIDENTS WITH SEVERE COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENTS HAVE FEEDING TUBES

CHICAGO—The use of feeding tubes among nursing home residents with severe cognitive impairment is common and is associated with patient characteristics as well as nursing home-related factors, according to a study in the July 2 issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

According to background information in the article, "A growing proportion of the approximately four million older U.S. adults with Alzheimer disease or other dementias are now surviving to the advanced stages of their illnesses. Eating and swallowing problems typically develop during the terminal stages of dementias. … The widespread use of feeding tubes among older persons with advanced cognitive impairment in the United States is concerning amid growing empirical data and expert opinion indicating that feeding tube use has no demonstrable health benefits in this population and may be associated with increased risks and discomfort," the authors write.

Susan L. Mitchell, M.D., M.P.H., from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, and colleagues examined how patient factors and facility characteristics are associated with feeding tube use among severely cognitively impaired older persons in U.S. nursing homes. The authors analyzed data from 186,835 individuals with advanced cognitive impairment who resided in Medicare- or Medicaid-certified U.S. nursing homes in 1999.

"Thirty-four percent of residents with advanced cognitive impairment had feeding tubes (n = 63,101)," the authors report. "Resident characteristics associated with a greater likelihood of feeding tube use included younger age, nonwhite race, male sex, divorced marital status, lack of advanced directives, a recent decline in functional status, and no diagnosis of Alzheimer disease."

The authors continue, "Controlling for these patient factors, residents living in facilities that were for profit, located in an urban area, having more than 100 beds and lacking a special dementia care unit had a higher likelihood of having a feeding tube. Additionally, feeding tube use was more likely among residents living in facilities that had a smaller proportion of residents with do-not-resuscitate orders, had a higher prevalence of non-white residents, and lacked a nurse practitioner or physician assistant on staff."

"Our findings highlight potential interventions and policy changes at the facility level that could influence this practice," the authors write. "Comprehensive implementation of advanced care planning is likely to reduce the use of feeding tubes. ... Feeding tube use may also be reduced by having providers and units dedicated to the care of nursing home residents with advanced cognitive impairment," the authors conclude.
(
JAMA. 2003;290:73-80. Available post-embargo at jama.com)

Editor's Note: Dr. Mitchell is supported by the National Institutes of Health and National Institute on Aging Mentored Patient Research Award and the Marcus Applebaum Fund at Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for Aged. Co-author Dr. Mor is supported by a National Institute on Aging MERIT Award. This work was supported by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

For More Information: Contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations Department at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or email: jamaarchmedia{at}ama-assn.org.

Go back to the top.


EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 3 P.M. (CT), TUESDAY, JULY 1, 2003
Media Advisory: To contact corresponding author Harlan M. Krumholz, M.D., S.M., call Karen Peart at 203/432-1326.


SOME MEDICATIONS INCORRECTLY PRESCRIBED FOR DIABETIC PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE

CHICAGO—Patients with diabetes and heart failure are commonly treated with the antihyperglycemic drugs metformin and thiazolidinediones, even though the FDA warns against this practice, according to an article in the July 2 issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

According to background information in the article, although diabetes and heart failure commonly coexist, the treatment of diabetes in patients with both conditions is complicated because some of the drugs known as "oral insulin sensitizers" are not recommended for treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure. According to package inserts, one of these drugs, metformin, is contraindicated in diabetic patients receiving drug treatment for heart failure therapy, and another class of these drugs, thiazolidinediones, are not recommended in diabetic patients with symptoms of advanced heart failure. Little is known about patterns of use of these drugs in diabetic patients with heart failure.

Frederick A. Masoudi, M.D., M.S.P.H., of the Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, and colleagues conducted a study to determine the proportions of patients hospitalized with heart failure and diabetes who were treated with metformin or thiazolidinediones. Data were extracted from medical records from nongovernmental acute care hospitals in the United States. It included two nationally representative samples of Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized with the primary diagnosis of heart failure and diabetes between April 1998 and March 1999 and between July 2000 and June 2001.

The researchers found: "In the 1998-1999 sample (n=12,505), 7.1 percent of patients were discharged with a prescription for metformin, 7.2 percent with a prescription for a thiazolidinedione, and 13.5 percent with a prescription for either drug. In the 2000-2001 sample (n=13,158), metformin use increased to 11.2 percent, thiazolidinedione use to 16.1 percent, and use of either drug to 24.4 percent. Similar increases were seen among patients of all age groups, all races, and both sexes."

"In this study of nationally representative samples of hospitalized heart failure patients with diabetes, the use of antihyperglycemic agents not recommended in the package insert in this setting was widespread. This practice nearly doubled between 1998-1999 and 2000-2001, reflecting increasing popularity and familiarity with these agents by prescribing physicians," the authors write. "Use of these drugs in patient populations at particularly high risk for adverse events (i.e., metformin with renal dysfunction or thiazolidinediones with insulin) also increased."

"There is a need for all parties interested in safe diabetes treatment to increase awareness of the recommended approach to diabetes in patients with heart failure," the researchers conclude.
(
JAMA. 2003;290:81-85. Available post-embargo at jama.com)

Editor's Note: Dr. Masoudi is supported by a NIH Research Career Award. The analyses upon which this publication is based were performed under a contract entitled "Utilization and Quality Control Peer Review Organization for the State of Colorado" sponsored by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services.

For More Information: Contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations Department at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or email: jamaarchmedia{at}ama-assn.org.

Go back to the top.


JAMA REPORTS

SIGMOIDOSCOPY MAY BE MORE EFFECTIVE AT PREVENTING COLON CANCER IF DONE MORE OFTEN THAN CURRENTLY RECOMMENDED

VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Charles feeding fish in aquarium

AUDIO:
74-YEAR OLD CHARLES YEH (Yay) LIKES TAKING CARE OF HIS FISH. A FEW YEARS AGO HE WAS THE ONE IN NEED OF CARE, AFTER A SIGMOIDOSCOPY EXAM FOUND AN ODD-SHAPED POLYP IN HIS COLON.

VIDEO:
SOT/FULL @:12
Super: Charles Yeh, Sigmoidoscopy patient
Runs: 08

AUDIO:
"They decided that it is suspicious, and odd shape normally can become cancerous, so they said I should have it out."

VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Sigmoidoscope

GFX/JAMA COVER

AUDIO:
CHARLES WAS PART OF A SIGMOIDOSCOPY STUDY, LOOKING AT HOW FREQUENTLY THE PROCEDURE, DONE WITH THIS INSTRUMENT, CATCHES ABNORMALITIES IN THE COLON. THE STUDY APPEARS IN THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION.

VIDEO:
SOT/FULL @:31
Super: Robert Schoen, M.D., M.P.H., University of Pittsburgh
Runs: 13

AUDIO:
"A sigmoidoscopy is a test where we insert a scope into the lower intestine, through the anus and into the intestine, and examine the lower bowel."

VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Dr. Schoen and colleague looking at computer screen

Close up sigmoidoscopy results on computer screen

More computer results

FULL SCREEN GRAPHIC

TITLE: Sigmoidoscopy results

9,000 Repeat Exams

1,300 Abnormalities

300 Pre-cancerous

78 Advanced pre-cancerous or cancer

AUDIO:
DR. ROBERT SCHOEN (SHOW-en) AND COLLEAGUES FROM UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, AND TWO OTHER INSTITUTIONS, STUDIED DATA FROM ABOUT 9-THOUSAND PEOPLE WHO HAD NEGATIVE SIGMOIDOSCOPY RESULTS. THE RESEARCHERS HAD THE PEOPLE COME BACK THREE YEARS LATER FOR ANOTHER SIGMOIDOSCOPY, INSTEAD OF WAITING THE CUSTOMARY FIVE YEARS. OF THOSE 9-THOUSAND PEOPLE, ABOUT 13-HUNDRED HAD AN ABNORMALITY DETECTED BY THE REPEAT EXAM. ABOUT THREE-HUNDRED OF THOSE HAD PRE-CANCEROUS ABNORMALITIES, AND OF THOSE, 78 HAD ADVANCED PRE-CANCEROUS TUMORS OR ACTUAL CANCER.

VIDEO:
SOT/FULL
Robert Schoen, M.D., M.P.H., University of Pittsburgh
Runs: 13

AUDIO:
"Looking at what the sigmoidoscopy could find after three years does have some implication or raise some questions about whether once in 10-year colonoscopy may be too long of an interval."

VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Different shots of Dr. Schoen and colleague looking at computer screen

Different angle of Charles at the aquarium

AUDIO:
A COLONOSCOPY IS A MORE THOROUGH AND EXPENSIVE COLORECTAL EXAM THAT'S RECOMMENDED EVERY TEN YEARS. CHARLES YEH IS GLAD HE DIDN'T WAIT TOO LONG TO HAVE ANOTHER EXAM... HIS POLYPS COULD HAVE TURNED INTO CANCER IF HE HADN'T CAUGHT THEM WITH THE SECOND SIGMOIDOSCOPY.

VIDEO:
SOT/FULL
Charles Yeh, Sigmoidoscopy patient
Runs: 08

AUDIO:
"It's not very uncomfortable, it's easy, it does not take too much time, and also it has a lot of benefits."

VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Dr. Schoen holding Sigmoidoscope

AUDIO:
BENEFITS LIKE SAVING YOUR LIFE. THIS IS MAVIS PRALL REPORTING.

HOME | EMBARGOED CONTENT | PAST ISSUES | EVENTS | HELP | SEARCH RELEASES
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.