JAMA & ARCHIVES
JAMA & Archives
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  EMBARGOED CONTENT  PAST ISSUES  EVENTS  HELP  SEARCH RELEASES

September 30, 2003

JAMA news releases are made available to the public after 3 p.m. US Central time on the first 4 Tuesdays of each month. The Archives Journals news releases are made available to the public after 3 p.m. Central time on Mondays. We also provide a list of previous news releases.

THIS WEEK'S CONTENT

JAMA NEWS RELEASES
(Embargoed for Release: 3 p.m. CT, Tuesday, September 30, 2003)


JAMA NEW RELEASES

>   WHEN INFANT BEGINS EATING CEREAL MAY BE RELATED TO INCREASED RISK FOR DEVELOPING ANTIBODIES ASSOCIATED WITH DIABETES

>   COMBINATION HORMONE THERAPY REDUCES THE RISK OF FRACTURES IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN, BUT OTHER ADVERSE EFFECTS OUTWEIGH BENEFITS

>   COMBINATION HORMONE THERAPY MAY INCREASE RISK OF OVARIAN CANCER AND NUMBER OF DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURES

>   NO RELATIONSHIP FOUND BETWEEN CHILDHOOD VACCINATION WITH VACCINES CONTAINING THIMEROSAL AND DEVELOPMENT OF AUTISM

JAMA REPORT (VIDEO NEWS RELEASE SCRIPT)

>   INFANT CEREAL LINKED TO INCREASED RISK OF TYPE I DIABETES AGE OF INTRODUCTION IS CRITICAL FACTOR


INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THESE NEWS RELEASES IS PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT. JOURNAL ATTRIBUTION IS REQUIRED.

TV Note: This week's JAMA video news release is on when an infant begins eating cereal possibly being related to an increased risk for developing an antibody associated with diabetes. The release will be fed Tuesday, September 30, from 9:00 - 9:30 a.m. ET on Telstar 6, Transponder 11 (C-Band) and from 2:00 - 2:30 p.m. ET on Telstar 6, Transponder 11 (C-Band). For more information, call 312/464-JAMA (5262).

Please Note: Our e-mail has changed to mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 3 P.M. (CT) TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2003
Media Advisory: To contact Jill M. Norris, M.P.H., Ph.D., call Sarah Ellis at 303/315-7470.
To contact Anette-G. Ziegler, M.D., email anziegler{at}lrz.uni-muenchen.de.
To contact editorialist Mark Atkinson, Ph.D., call Tom Nordlie at 352/392-2755.


WHEN INFANT BEGINS EATING CEREAL MAY BE RELATED TO INCREASED RISK FOR DEVELOPING ANTIBODIES ASSOCIATED WITH DIABETES

CHICAGO—Infants who are susceptible to diabetes and are initially exposed to cereal before four months, or after six months of age, have an increased risk of developing antibodies to islet cells (cells in the pancreas that produce insulin), which is thought to precede the development of diabetes, according to an article in the October 1 issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

According to background information in the article, dietary exposures in infancy have been implicated, although not consistently, as a factor in type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM).

Jill M. Norris, M.P.H., Ph.D., of the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, and colleagues examined the association between exposure to cereals in the infant diet and appearance of islet autoantibodies (IA) in a birth cohort of children at increased risk of type 1 DM, based on genotype and family history of DM. Islet autoantibodies are a type of antibodies associated with diabetes, and can be present for years prior to the diagnosis of type 1 DM.

The study included 1,183 children at increased risk of type 1 DM. The researchers obtained exposure and outcome measures on 76 percent of enrolled children. The study was conducted from 1994 to 2002 with an average follow-up of four years.

After adjusting for covariates and confounders, the researchers found that compared with children who were exposed to cereal between ages 4 and 6 months, children exposed to any cereals before 4 months of age had a 4.32 times greater risk for IA, and those who were first exposed at 7 months or older had a 5.36 times increased risk for IA.

"Our results do not suggest any need to change the current U.S. infant feeding guidelines with regard to cereal introduction [between 4-6 months of age]," the authors conclude.
(
JAMA. 2003;290:1713-1720. Available post-embargo at jama.com)

Editor's Note: This research was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health.


INFANTS THAT RECEIVE GLUTEN-CONTAINING FOODS EARLY MAY HAVE INCREASED RISK FOR DEVELOPING ANTIBODIES ASSOCIATED WITH DIABETES

In a related article in this week's JAMA, Anette-G. Ziegler, M.D., of the Diabetes Research Institute in Munich, Germany, and colleagues examined whether timing of exposures to breast milk, milk formula, solid foods, or gluten-containing foods is associated with an increased risk of developing antibodies to islet cells in children of parents with type 1 DM.

The autoimmunity that precedes type 1 DM can appear in the first years of life, suggesting that environmental agents encountered early in life, such as dietary factors, could be triggers of the disease process, according to background information in the article.

The study followed 1,610 newborn children of parents with type 1 DM. Blood samples were obtained at birth, age 9 months, 2, 5, and 8 years. Breastfeeding data were obtained by questionnaires and food supplementation data were obtained by family interview. Gluten-containing foods contain wheat, rye, barley, or oat, and include breads, biscuits, cakes, porridge, pasta, and flour products. The study was conducted from 1989 to 2003 in inpatient/outpatient clinics in Germany.

"Early introduction of gluten-containing foods was found to be a risk factor for the development of type 1 DM-associated autoantibodies in children of parents with type 1 DM," the authors write. "Exposure to dietary gluten before age 3 months showed a 5-fold higher risk for the development of islet autoantibodies than those who were exposed after age 3 months."

"Islet autoantibody risk was not associated with reduced breastfeeding. These findings indicate that early introduction of gluten-containing foods should be avoided in children who are genetically predisposed to type 1 DM," they add. "... the data suggest that the prevalence of islet autoimmunity could be reduced if all families complied with infant feeding guidelines and did not introduce gluten-containing and solid foods to infants until after age 3 months. A significant effect on type 1 DM incidence may be expected if the association also is found with type 1 DM risk and if it is found in children of parents without DM."
(JAMA. 2003;290:1721-1728). Available post-embargo at jama.com.

Editor's Note: This study was supported by grants from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, the Stiftung 'Das Zuckerkranke Kind', the Bundesministerium fr Forschung und Technologie, and the Deutsche Diabetesgesellschaft (Dr. Buding-Stiftung [grant]).

EDITORIAL: INFANT DIETS AND TYPE 1 DIABETES - TOO EARLY, TOO LATE, OR JUST TOO COMPLICATED?

In an accompanying editorial, Mark Atkinson, Ph.D., of the University of Florida, Gainesville, and Edwin A.M. Gale, M.D., of the University of Bristol, England, examine the issue of how much confidence researchers, clinicians, and parents should place in these findings.

"At this stage, cautious interest might seem the appropriate response," they write. "Autoantibody positivity is used as the outcome measure, and, while this is a powerful predictive measure, the most critical outcome must be actual development of diabetes. A final concern with observational studies like these is the low number of end points-in this case islet autoimmunity with or without progression to diabetes."

"…it is clear that the reports [in this week's JAMA] do not present sufficient evidence to suggest that 'infant cereal causes diabetes,' and hopefully will not be misinterpreted as such by parents and the public. Accordingly, given current knowledge, the recommendation put forth by Norris et al is most appropriate-current infant feeding guidelines should not be changed. In addition, further prospective cohorts must be examined to confirm and extend these findings," they conclude.
(JAMA. 2003;290:1771-1772). Available post-embargo at jama.com.

For More Information: Contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations Department at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or email: mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org (please note new email address).

Go back to the top.


EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 3 P.M. (CT) TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2003
Media Advisory: To contact Jane A. Cauley, Dr.P.H., call Kathryn Duda at 412/624-2607.


COMBINATION HORMONE THERAPY REDUCES THE RISK OF FRACTURES IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN, BUT OTHER ADVERSE EFFECTS OUTWEIGH BENEFITS

CHICAGO—An updated analysis of data from the Women's Health Initiative study shows that estrogen plus progestin reduces the risk of fracture in healthy postmenopausal women, but the increased risk of other disease outcomes results in no net benefit. The study appears in the October 1 issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

Jane A. Cauley, Dr.P.H., from the University of Pittsburgh, and other investigators from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI), analyzed data from the randomized clinical trial to determine if the relative risk reduction of estrogen plus progestin on fractures differed by risk factors for fracture. The WHI enrolled 16,608 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years who were randomized to receive either 0.625 mg/d (milligrams per day) of estrogen plus 2.5 mg/d of progestin or a placebo and followed-up for an average of 5.6 years.

The study looking at the effects of combination hormone therapy on various chronic diseases of older women was stopped three years earlier than planned because of safety concerns, including an increase in risks of cardiovascular disease and breast cancer. The main study results were published in July 2002, and showed that hip and clinical vertebral fractures were significantly reduced by 34 percent and total osteoporotic fractures by 24 percent, according to the authors. The estrogen-only arm of the WHI trial is continuing and is scheduled to be completed in 2005. Researchers are also looking at the rate of fractures in that trial.

In this current updated study, the authors report: "A total of 733 women (8.6 percent) in the estrogen-plus-progestin group and 896 (11.1 percent) in the placebo group experienced a fracture during the follow-up period of 5.6 years. ... Estrogen plus progestin reduced the risk of hip fracture by 33 percent." Overall fractures were reduced by 24 percent. The combination hormone therapy also showed consistent positive effects on hip and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD).

"In conclusion, estrogen-plus-progestin increases BMD and reduces the risk of fracture in healthy postmenopausal women and appears to do so regardless of presence or absence of risk factors. When considering the effects of hormone therapy on other important disease outcomes in a global model, there was no net benefit in this study, even in women considered to be at high risk of fracture. Given the overall unfavorable risk-benefit ratio and the availability of other agents for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, treatment with estrogen plus progestin should not be recommended for prevention or for treatment of osteoporosis in women without vasomotor [e.g., hot flashes] symptoms. Before the combination of estrogen and progestin is considered for the purpose of fracture prevention, women should be fully informed of the potential adverse effects."
(
JAMA. 2003;290:1729-1738. Available post-embargo at jama.com)

Editor's Note: The WHI program is funded by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Study drug and placebo were provided by Wyeth. Please see study for authors' financial disclosures.

For More Information: Contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations Department at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or email: mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org (please note new email address).

Go back to the top.


EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 3 P.M. (CT) TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2003
Media Advisory: To contact Garnet L. Anderson, Ph.D., call Kristen Woodward at 206/667-5095.


COMBINATION HORMONE THERAPY MAY INCREASE RISK OF OVARIAN CANCER AND NUMBER OF DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURES

CHICAGO—Continuous combined estrogen plus progestin therapy may increase the risk of ovarian cancer and may also increase the number of endometrial biopsies used to diagnose cancers, according to a study based on a new analysis of data from the Women's Health Initiative and published in the October 1 issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

"For years, there has been concern about possible associations of gynecologic malignancies with postmenopausal hormone therapy," the authors provide as background information. "The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial of estrogen plus progestin provides the first opportunity to examine possible associations of gynecologic malignancies with continuous combined postmenopausal hormone therapy in a large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled setting." The trial was stopped early because health risks (e.g., increased risk of breast cancer) were found to outweigh the benefits of the therapy, and the main study results were published in July, 2002.

Garnet L. Anderson, Ph.D., from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, and colleagues performed this study to determine the possible associations of estrogen plus progestin on gynecologic cancers and related diagnostic procedures.

The WHI trial involved 16,608 postmenopausal women at 40 U.S. clinical centers who had not had a hysterectomy. The women were randomized in two groups - one that received a placebo and the other a single tablet of 0.625 mg/d (milligrams per day) of conjugated equine estrogens plus 2.5 mg/d of medroxyprogesterone acetate (Prempro). Women who had a prior hysterectomy were randomized to a parallel trial of estrogen alone and that trial is continuing until 2005.

In 5.6 years of follow-up, estrogen plus progestin reduced endometrial cancer rates by 19 percent, but increased ovarian cancer rates by 58 percent. These differences were not statistically significant, however. No evidence of a difference was found between treatment groups in the distribution of tumor anatomy, grade, or stage of disease at diagnosis. The numbers of other gynecologic cancers were too small to make reliable conclusions.

There were 27 ovarian cancers diagnosed per 100,000 women per year in women randomized to placebo. With estrogen plus progestin use, this rate was increased to 42 cancers in 100,000 women per year. Thus even if the observed effect is real, ovarian cancer remains a rare disease in women taking these hormones, the authors state.

Though combined hormones appear to have a slightly protective effect on endometrial cancer, this therapy does not completely prevent the disease. The authors note that the vaginal bleeding that commonly occurs with this therapy must be monitored. In the trial, "Women randomized to continuous combined hormones were subjected to more endometrial biopsies and vaginal ultrasounds and were more frequently found to have mild abnormalities in routine Papanicolaou [Pap] tests," the authors found.

The authors concluded that, "The possibility of an increased risk of ovarian cancer incidence and mortality remains worrisome, however, and needs confirmation. The increased need for diagnostic procedures in response to bleeding is an added burden and could reasonably affect a woman's decision to use these medicines. These data provide further support for the recently revised guidelines for the use of continuous combined estrogen plus progestin therapy."
(
JAMA. 2003;290:1739-1748. Available post-embargo at jama.com)

Editor's Note: The WHI program is funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Wyeth-Ayerst Research provided the study medication (active and placebo). Please see the study for the authors' financial disclosures.

For More Information: Contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations Department at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or email: mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org (please note new email address).

Go back to the top.


EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 3 P.M. (CT) TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2003
Media Advisory: To contact Anders Hviid, M.Sc., email aii{at}ssi.dk


NO RELATIONSHIP FOUND BETWEEN CHILDHOOD VACCINATION WITH VACCINES CONTAINING THIMEROSAL AND DEVELOPMENT OF AUTISM

CHICAGO—Researchers have found no association between thimerosal-containing vaccines and the development of autism in children who received the vaccine, according to an article in the October 1 issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

According to background information in the article, thimerosal, a preservative used in some vaccine formulations, contains ethylmercury. At high doses, mercuric compounds can cause toxic effects in the kidneys and nervous system. It has been suggested that childhood vaccination with thimerosal-containing vaccine could be causally related to neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and language and speech delay.

Anders Hviid, M.Sc., and colleagues from the Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark, studied children who were vaccinated with a thimerosal-containing pertussis vaccine and children vaccinated with the same pertussis vaccine formulated without thimerosal and compared these two groups with respect to development of autism and other autistic-spectrum disorders. The study included all children born in Denmark from January 1, 1990, until December 31, 1996 (n=467,450).

The researchers identified 440 autism cases and 787 cases of other autistic-spectrum disorders. The risk of autism and other autistic-spectrum disorders did not differ significantly between children vaccinated with thimerosal-containing vaccine and children vaccinated with thimerosal-free vaccine. Furthermore, there was no indication of a dose-response association between autism and the amount of ethylmercury received through thimerosal.

The authors conclude that, "The results do not support a causal relationship between childhood vaccination with thimerosal-containing vaccines and development of autistic-spectrum disorders."
(
JAMA. 2003;290:1763-1766. Available post-embargo at jama.com)

Editor's Note: The study was supported by a grant from the Danish National Research Foundation and a grant from the Danish Medical Research Council.

For More Information: Contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations Department at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or email: mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org (please note new email address).

Go back to the top.


JAMA REPORTS

INFANT CEREAL LINKED TO INCREASED RISK OF TYPE I DIABETES AGE OF INTRODUCTION IS CRITICAL FACTOR

VIDEO:
NAT SOT UP FULL
Runs : 03
Mom feeding infant

AUDIO:
"(Cooing sounds), there's a good boy."

VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Mom feeding infant

AUDIO:
THIS BABY IS STARTING TO EAT INFANT CEREAL AT THE RECOMMENDED TIME... BETWEEN FOUR AND SIX MONTHS OF AGE. BUT COULD INFANT CEREAL BE LINKED TO RISK OF TYPE ONE DIABETES, THE KIND OF DIABETES MOST OFTEN FOUND IN CHILDREN?

VIDEO:
SOT/FULL
@: 14
Super: Jill Norris, M.P.H., Ph.D., Univ. of Colorado Health Sciences Center
Runs :07

AUDIO:
"Infant diet could be very important with the development of the immune system and risk for autoimmune diseases later in life."

VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Dr. Norris with colleague going over data

Mother feeding infant cereal

GFX/JAMA COVER

AUDIO:
AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES SUCH AS TYPE ONE DIABETES. DR. JILL NORRIS AND HER COLLEAGUES AT UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER IN DENVER IDENTIFIED MORE THAN A THOUSAND NEWBORNS AT HIGH RISK OF DEVELOPING DIABETES. THE BABIES EITHER HAD A CLOSE RELATIVE WITH THE DISEASE, OR BLOOD TESTS SHOWED THEY WERE PRE-DISPOSED TO GET IT. RESEARCHERS QUESTIONED THE BABIES' MOTHERS EVERY THREE MONTHS FOR FIFTEEN MONTHS, ASKING ABOUT THE BABIES' DIETS. RESEARCHERS ALSO TESTED THE BABIES' BLOOD TO SEE IF THEY WERE DEVELOPING SIGNS OF TYPE ONE DIABETES. THE STUDY FINDINGS APPEAR IN THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION.

VIDEO:
SOT/FULL
Runs :07
Jill Norris, M.P.H., Ph.D., Univ. of Colorado Health Sciences Center

AUDIO:
"We found that timing of the introduction of cereal in the infant diet might play a role in why people get diabetes autoimmunity or type one diabetes."

VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Mother feeding baby

FULL SCREEN GRAPHIC
Title: Infant cereal and risk of Type I Diabetes

  AGE   RISK
0-3 months 4 times as likely
7-10 months 5 times as likely


AUDIO:
DIABETES AUTOIMMUNITY IS A PRECURSOR TO DIABETES. CHILDREN FED INFANT CEREAL BETWEEN BIRTH AND THREE MONTHS OF AGE WERE FOUR TIMES AS LIKELY TO DEVELOP DIABETES AUTOIMMUNITY AS CHILDREN WHO WERE FIRST FED CEREAL AT THE RECOMMENDED FOUR TO SIX MONTHS OF AGE. NOT ONLY THAT, BUT CHILDREN WHO FIRST ATE CEREAL AFTER THE RECOMMENDED AGE RANGE WERE FIVE TIMES AS LIKELY TO DEVELOP DIABETES AUTOIMMUNITY.

VIDEO:
SOT/FULL
Jill Norris, M.P.H., Ph.D., Univ. of Colorado Health Sciences Center
Runs :10

AUDIO:
"Not only is there an increased risk with a very early exposure to cereals, but there's an increased risk associated with waiting until a later age to introduce cereals."

VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Harriet and Alex outside

AUDIO:
HARRIET AUSTIN'S SIX-YEAR-OLD SON ALEX IS AT RISK OF DEVELOPING DIABETES BECAUSE IT RUNS IN HIS FAMILY.

VIDEO:
SOT/FULL
@: 1:40
Super: Harriet Austin, Mother
Runs: 08

AUDIO:
"It never occurred to me that feeding my child cereal within a particular developmental window would have any effect on his diabetes risk."

VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Mother feeding baby infant cereal

AUDIO:
BUT THIS NEW STUDY SAYS IT MAY HAVE AN EFFECT, SO STARTING INFANT CEREAL BETWEEN FOUR AND SIX MONTHS OF AGE IS THE BEST ADVICE. THIS IS MAVIS PRALL REPORTING.

HOME | EMBARGOED CONTENT | PAST ISSUES | EVENTS | HELP | SEARCH RELEASES
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.