JAMA news releases are made available to the public after 3 pm US Central time on the first 4 Tuesdays of each month. The Archives Journals news releases are made available to the public after 3 pm Central time on Mondays. We also provide a list of previous news releases.
THIS WEEK'S CONTENT
JAMA NEWS RELEASES
(Embargoed for Release: 3 p.m. CT, Tuesday, March 16, 2004)
JAMA NEW RELEASES
RADIATION THERAPY EFFECTIVE FOR SOME PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT CANCER AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
TRANSDERMAL PATCH AS EFFECTIVE AS INTRAVENOUS PUMP FOR POST-OP PAIN CONTROL
HOME BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING MAY BE BETTER THAN OFFICE BLOOD PRESSURE FOR PREDICTING CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS
INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THESE NEWS RELEASES IS PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT. JOURNAL ATTRIBUTION IS REQUIRED.
TV Note: This week's JAMA video news release is on using a transdermal patch for pain control. The release will be fed Tuesday, March 16, from 9:00 - 9:30 a.m. ET on Telstar 6, Transponder 11 (C-Band) and from 2:00 - 2:30 p.m. ET on Telstar 6, Transponder 11 (C-Band). For more information, call 312/464-JAMA (5262).
Please Note: Our e-mail has changed to mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org
JOURNALISTS CAN NOW ACCESS EMBARGOED JAMA/ARCHIVES STUDIES ONLINE
Go to www.jamamedia.org for more information and to apply for access.
Please Note: The FOR THE MEDIA Web site now has a search feature to enable media to find previous JAMA/Archives news releases on specific medical topics. This search feature link is located on the home page at www.jamamedia.org
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 3 P.M. CT, TUESDAY, March 16, 2004
Media Advisory: To contact corresponding author Kevin M. Slawin, M.D., call Kimberlee Barbour at 713-798-4710. To contact editorialist Mitchell S. Anscher, M.D., call Becky Levine at 919-684-4148.
RADIATION THERAPY EFFECTIVE FOR SOME PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT CANCER AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
CHICAGOFor men with prostate cancer who have had their prostate removed and later show signs of cancer recurrence, several factors can help predict response to subsequent radiation therapy, according to a study in the March 17 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).
Approximately 30,000 men annually in the United States will have recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (removal of the prostate), according to background information in the article. Salvage radiotherapy (radiation therapy following prostatectomy) may potentially cure patients whose disease recurs after radical prostatectomy, but previously gathered evidence suggests that it is ineffective in the patients at highest risk of spread of disease.
Andrew J. Stephenson, M.D., of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, and colleagues conducted a multicenter analysis of the outcome of salvage radiotherapy in a group of patients with recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy to identify variables that are associated with an effective response.
The study included 501 patients at 5 U.S. academic centers who received salvage radiotherapy between June 1987 and November 2002 for detectable and increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after radical prostatectomy. PSA is a protein that is found in the blood and that is used to detect and monitor prostate cancer.
The researchers found that over an average follow-up of 45 months, 250 patients (50 percent) experienced disease progression after treatment, 49 (10 percent) developed distant metastases, 20 (4 percent) died from prostate cancer, and 21 (4 percent) died from other or unknown causes. The 4-year progression-free probability (PFP) was 45 percent. "In this cohort, a Gleason score [tumor grade] of 8 to 10, preradiotherapy PSA level greater than 2.0 ng/mL, negative surgical margins [no evidence of cancer cells in the edges of the removed tissue], PSA doubling time (PSADT) of 10 months or less, and seminal vesicle invasion [cancer spreading to structures near the urinary bladder of males] were significant predictors of disease progression despite salvage radiotherapy. Yet we demonstrated that subsets of patients with high-grade disease and/or a rapid PSADT who were thought to be incurable could still achieve a durable response to salvage radiotherapy when the treatment was administered early in the course of recurrent disease. These results suggest that salvage radiotherapy may prevent metastatic disease progression for those patients at the highest risk," the authors write.
"On the basis of our results, we believe that patients with positive surgical margins who experience relapse after radical prostatectomy should be strongly considered for salvage radiotherapy, even those with high-grade disease and/or a rapid PSADT. We have developed a predictive model to estimate the likelihood of treatment success for a given individual that will help guide physicians in the selection of patients for this therapy," the researchers write. "The clinical implications of our findings are that locally recurrent prostate cancer appears to be more common than previously reported, that it is frequently associated with aggressive features, and that salvage radiotherapy offers the possibility of cure for a substantial proportion of patients with a rapid PSADT and high-grade cancer."
(JAMA. 2004;291:1325-1332. Available post-embargo at jama.com)
Editor's Note: For information on the funding of this study and the financial disclosures of the authors, please see the JAMA article.
EDITORIAL: SALVAGE RADIOTHERAPY FOR RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER - THE EARLIER THE BETTER
In an accompanying editorial, Mitchell S. Anscher, M.D., of Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C., suggests that the most important finding from this study probably could have been anticipated-early treatment is better.
"That early treatment is better than late treatment should come as no surprise, as this is a fundamental principal of oncology. In the pre-PSA era, factors were identified that predicted for a high risk of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy, most notably positive surgical margins and the absence of seminal vesicle invasion, and these also are among the strongest predictors of success of salvage radiotherapy in the present study," Dr. Anscher writes.
"Salvage radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy is a treatment that is used too infrequently and too late in the course of the disease. This is particularly true for patients who might benefit the most, namely, those with positive surgical margins and aggressive features who would go on to develop distant metastases if left untreated. Outside the context of a clinical trial, these patients should be offered early salvage therapy, i.e., as soon as an increase in the PSA levels is confirmed. Better still, these patients are candidates for adjuvant radiotherapy, which is more effective and less toxic than salvage treatment," Dr. Anscher concludes.
(JAMA. 2004;291:1380-1381. Available post-embargo at jama.com)
For More Information: Contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations Department at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or email: mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org (please note new email address).
Go back to the top.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 3 P.M. CT, TUESDAY, March 16, 2004
Media Advisory: To contact Eugene R. Viscusi, M.D., call Jeffrey Baxt at 215-955-5507.
TRANSDERMAL PATCH AS EFFECTIVE AS INTRAVENOUS PUMP FOR POST-OP PAIN CONTROL
CHICAGOUse of a transdermal patch to deliver pain medication was found to be equivalent to medication delivered by an intravenous pump for controlling pain following surgery, according to a study in the March 17 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).
Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) allows the patient to self-administer small doses of opioids, such as fentanyl and morphine, as needed to control pain, according to background information in the article. PCA with an intravenous (IV) pump with morphine is a common method of providing postoperative pain control after major surgery. The fentanyl hydrochloride patient-controlled transdermal system (PCTS) eliminates the need for the use of needles, intravenous tubing, a large pump, and does not hinder mobility. The transdermal system is a self-adhesive unit, about the size of a credit card, and is worn on the patient's upper arm or chest. It delivers small doses of fentanyl into the skin, where it then diffuses into the local circulation and is transported to the central nervous system.
Eugene R. Viscusi, M.D., of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, and colleagues conducted a study to determine whether the transdermal PCA delivery system is equivalent to a standard morphine IV PCA regimen in postoperative pain management. The trial included 636 adult patients who had just undergone major surgery between September 2000 and March 2001 at 33 North American hospitals. In surgical recovery rooms, patients were randomly assigned to intravenous morphine by a patient-controlled analgesia pump (n = 320) or fentanyl hydrochloride by a patient-controlled transdermal system (n = 316).
The researchers found that fentanyl hydrochloride PCTS and IV PCA morphine were equivalent according to the primary end point of ratings of pain control during the first 24-hour treatment period. Ratings of good or excellent pain control were reported by 73.7 percent of patients who received fentanyl PCTS and 76.9 percent of patients who received IV PCA morphine.
"Early patient discontinuations (25.9 percent fentanyl vs. 25.0 percent morphine) and last pain intensity scores (32.7 fentanyl vs. 31.1 morphine on the visual analog scale) were not different between the 2 treatments. With continued treatment for up to 48 or 72 hours, more than 80 percent of patient assessments in each treatment group were good or excellent. The incidence of opioid-related adverse events was similar between the groups," the researchers write.
(JAMA. 2004;291:1333-1341. Available post-embargo at jama.com)
Editor's Note: ALZA Corporation, Mountain View, Calif., supported the study in its entirety. Co-authors Drs. Atkinson and Khanna own stock in Johnson & Johnson, the parent company of Alza Corporation.
For More Information: Contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations Department at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or email: mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org
Go back to the top.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 3 P.M. CT, TUESDAY, March 16, 2004
Media Advisory: To contact Guillaume Bobrie, M.D., email:
guillaume.bobrie{at}hop.egp.ap-hop-paris.fr
HOME BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING MAY BE BETTER THAN OFFICE BLOOD PRESSURE FOR PREDICTING CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS
CHICAGOHome blood pressure monitoring may have better prognostic accuracy than office blood pressure measurements for patients treated for high blood pressure, according to a study in the March 17 issue of the American Medical Association (JAMA).
Guillaume Bobrie, M.D., from the Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou, Paris, and colleagues from the SHEAF (Self-Measurement of Blood Pressure at Home in the Elderly: Assessment and Follow-up) study assessed the prognostic value of home versus office blood pressure measurement by general practitioners in a European population of elderly patients treated for hypertension (high blood pressure). Office and home blood pressure and cardiac risk factors were measured at baseline (the start of the study) in a group of 4,939 patients being treated for hypertension. The average age of the study participants was 70 years and 48.9 percent of the participants were men. The patients were followed up for an average of 3.2 years.
The researchers report that at the end of the study follow-up at least one cardiovascular event (for example: cardiovascular cause of death, or non-fatal heart attack, stroke, angioplasty, coronary artery bypass graft surgery) had occurred in 324 patients. "For BP (blood pressure) self-measurement at home, each 10-mm Hg (millimeters of mercury) increase in systolic [first, larger BP number] BP increased the risk of a cardiovascular event by 17.2 percent and each 5-mm Hg increase in diastolic [second, smaller BP number] BP increased that risk by 11.7 percent," the authors write. "Conversely, for the same increase in BP observed using office measurement, there was no significant increase in the risk of a cardiovascular event."
"In conclusion, home BP self-measurement has a better prognostic value than office BP measurement. In this elderly population, office BP measurement failed to identify 13 percent of patients with elevated BP in the office but not at home with a good prognosis and 9 percent of those with elevated BP at home but not in the office with a poor prognosis. The frequency of this double error, which is both diagnostic (with respect to the control of hypertension) and prognostic (with respect to the incidence of cardiovascular events), suggests that the monitoring of patients being treated for hypertension must include home BP self-measurement, which is the method preferred by patients, with an excellent feasibility."
(JAMA. 2004;291:1342-1349. Available post-embargo at jama.com)
Editor's Note: The study was supported by funding from Laboratoire Aventis.
For More Information: Contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations Department at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or email: mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org
Go back to the top.
JAMA REPORTS
PAIN PATCH AN EQUAL MATCH
VIDEO:
B-roll: Nurse helping a patient with traditional IV pain pump
Shot of patient with finger on pain button
AUDIO:
THIS WOMAN IS ABOUT TO UNDERGO SURGERY. WAITING FOR HER WHEN SHE GETS OUT
IS THIS TRADITIONAL INTRAVENOUS (I-V) PUMP. SHE'LL BE ABLE TO GIVE HERSELF
SMALL DOSES OF PAIN MEDICATION WHEN NEEDED. THAT'S THE GOOD NEWS. HOWEVER
THE I-V SYSTEM INVOLVES NEEDLES, TUBES AND SOMETIMES MALFUNCTIONING
MACHINES.
VIDEO:
SOT/FULL
Super @:18
Gene R. Viscusi, M.D., Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
AUDIO:
"The concept is good, it is just a little old and cumbersome."
VIDEO:
B-roll: Dr. Viscusi with colleagues
Shots of pain "patch"
GFX: JAMA cover
AUDIO:
DR. GENE VISCUSI AND SEVERAL COLLEAGUES AT THE THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY
TESTED THE I-V PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA (PCA) -- AGAINST A NEW CREDIT
CARD LOOKING DEVICE THAT IS PLACED ON THE UPPER ARM TO ADMINISTER PAIN
MEDICATION THROUGH THE SKIN. THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY ARE PUBLISHED IN THIS
WEEK'S JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION.
VIDEO:
SOT/FULL
Gene R. Viscusi, M.D., Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
AUDIO:
"The findings of the study showed that the new device, E-Trans Fentanyl PCTS
compared very favorably with the traditional IV-PCA, head to head they
looked almost identical."
VIDEO:
B-roll: Shots of Thomas Reed in his home making dinner
AUDIO:
THOMAS REED TOOK PART IN THE STUDY. AFTER PROSTATE SURGERY THREE YEARS AGO,
REED WAS GIVEN THE PAIN "PATCH".
VIDEO:
SOT/FULL
Super @ 1:00
Thomas Reed, Study participant
AUDIO:
"There's no pain involved. You only hit a little button and it administered
your medication. There was no discomfort, no nothing involved in it. It
was as simple as one, two, three."
VIDEO:
SOT/FULL
Gene R. Viscusi, M.D., Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
AUDIO:
"It is able to deliver a potent pain reliever through the skin with a very,
very tiny electric current at the demand of the patient."
VIDEO:
B-roll: Shot of pain "patch" and I-V pump together
Nurse helping patient just before surgery
AUDIO:
BOTH TYPES OF PAIN SYSTEMS KEEP POST-OPERATIVE PATIENTS PAIN FREE, BUT THE
"PATCH" DEVICE ALLOWS PATIENTS MORE MOBILITY IN THEIR RECOVERY AND DEMANDS
LESS TIME FROM THE NURSING STAFF.
THIS IS LAURA MEEHAN REPORTING.