JAMA & ARCHIVES
JAMA & Archives
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  EMBARGOED CONTENT  PAST ISSUES  EVENTS  HELP  SEARCH RELEASES


June 1, 2004

JAMA news releases are made available to the public after 3 pm US Central time on the first 4 Tuesdays of each month. The Archives Journals news releases are made available to the public after 3 pm Central time on Mondays. We also provide a list of previous news releases.

THIS WEEK'S CONTENT

JAMA NEWS RELEASES
(Special Embargo for Release: 10 a.m. ET, Tuesday, June 1, 2004)


JAMA NEWS RELEASES (GLOBAL HEALTH THEME ISSUE)

>   HANDWASHING PROGRAM DECREASES INCIDENCE OF DIARRHEA AMONG CHILDREN AT HIGH RISK OF DEATH FROM DIARRHEA IN PAKISTAN

>   LARGE-SCALE INCENTIVE-BASED INTERVENTION WITH NUTRITIONAL COMPONENT IMPROVES HEALTH STATUS OF CHILDREN IN MEXICO

>   WORLD MENTAL HEALTH SURVEYS FIND MENTAL DISORDERS HIGHLY PREVALENT AND OFTEN UNTREATED

>   CHRONIC DISEASES NEED GLOBAL HEALTH ATTENTION


INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THESE NEWS RELEASES IS PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT. JOURNAL ATTRIBUTION IS REQUIRED.

TV Note: This week's JAMA video news release is on the effect of an intensive handwashing promotion on childhood diarrhea in high risk communities. The release will be fed Tuesday, June 1, from 9:00 - 9:30 a.m. ET on Telstar 6, Transponder 11 (C-Band) and from 2:00 - 2:30 p.m. ET on Telstar 6, Transponder 11 (C-Band). For more information, call 312/464-JAMA (5262).

Please Note: Our e-mail has changed to mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org

JOURNALISTS CAN NOW ACCESS EMBARGOED JAMA/ARCHIVES STUDIES ONLINE

Go to www.jamamedia.org for more information and to apply for access.

Please Note: The FOR THE MEDIA Web site now has a search feature to enable media to find previous JAMA/Archives news releases on specific medical topics. This search feature link is located on the home page at www.jamamedia.org

SAVE THE DATE: JAMA will present new research from its theme issue on Global Health on Tuesday, June 1, from 10 a.m. to 12:15 p.m. at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. A program and registration form are included in this email. To register online, go to www.jamamedia.org and click on Events.

New research from JAMA's theme issue on HIV/AIDS will be presented at the 15th International AIDS Conference in Bangkok, Thailand, on Sunday, July 11, from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m., at the Oriental Hotel in Bangkok. A program and registration form will be included in a future email.

SPECIAL EMBARGO FOR RELEASE: 10 A.M. (ET) TUESDAY, June 1, 2004
Media Advisory: To contact Stephen P. Luby, M.D., call Llewlyn Grant at 404-639-7286.

HANDWASHING PROGRAM DECREASES INCIDENCE OF DIARRHEA AMONG CHILDREN AT HIGH RISK OF DEATH FROM DIARRHEA IN PAKISTAN

WASHINGTON, D.C.—An intensive program of handwashing education and promotion in Pakistan decreased the incidence of diarrhea by more than 50 percent among children, according to a study in the June 2 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), a theme issue on Global Health.

Stephen P. Luby, M.D., of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, presented the findings of the study today at a JAMA media briefing at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C.

Nearly 2 million children worldwide die annually from diarrheal disease, according to background information in the article. Previous studies have estimated that handwashing promotion interventions could prevent 1 million child deaths per year. Washing hands with soap prevents diarrhea, but children at the highest risk of death from diarrhea are younger than 1 year, too young to wash their own hands. Previous studies could not adequately assess the impact of household handwashing on diarrhea in infants.

Dr. Luby and colleagues evaluated whether promotion of handwashing with soap among adult and children household members decreased diarrhea among children at the highest risk of death from diarrhea. The study was conducted among 36 low-income neighborhoods in urban squatter settlements in Karachi, Pakistan. Eligible households located in the study area had at least 2 children younger than 15 years, at least 1 of whom was younger than 5 years.

As part of the intervention, field workers visited participating households at least weekly from April 2002 to April 2003 in 25 neighborhoods to provide education to all household members old enough to understand about proper handwashing with soap after defecation and before preparing food, eating, and feeding a child. They used slide shows, videotapes, and pamphlets to illustrate health problems resulting from contaminated hands. Within intervention neighborhoods, 300 households (1,523 children) received a regular supply of antibacterial soap and 300 households (1,640 children) received plain soap. A total of 11 neighborhoods (306 households and 1,528 children) were randomized to the control group, which did not receive handwashing education or soap.

The researchers found that children younger than 15 years living in households that received handwashing education and plain soap had a 53 percent lower incidence of diarrhea compared with children living in households that did not receive such education or soap. "Infants living in households that received handwashing promotion and plain soap had 39 percent fewer days with diarrhea vs. infants living in control neighborhoods. Severely malnourished children younger than 5 years living in households that received handwashing promotion and plain soap had 42 percent fewer days with diarrhea vs. severely malnourished children in the control group," the authors write.

The authors found similar reductions in diarrhea in households using both plain and antibacterial soap. The authors report, "We found no significant difference in diarrheal disease among persons living in households receiving antibacterial soap compared with plain soap. This is not surprising because triclocarban [in the antibacterial soap] is a bacteriostatic agent that inhibits the growth of some gram-positive bacteria but is not effective against gram-negative bacteria, viruses, or parasites that cause infectious diarrhea." The authors note that the act of handwashing with soap physically removes pathogens that may cause diarrhea from hands that might otherwise transmit these pathogens to vulnerable infants.

"Although visiting households weekly to provide free soap and encourage handwashing was effective in reducing diarrhea, this approach is prohibitively expensive for widespread implementation. The next essential step is to develop effective approaches to promote handwashing that cost less and can be used to reach millions of at-risk households. Studies evaluating the durability of behavioral change from handwashing promotion are also important to assess cost-effectiveness. In the interim, existing public health programs should experiment with integrating handwashing promotion into their current activities," the authors conclude.
(
JAMA. 2004;291:2547-2554. Available post-embargo at jama.com)

Editor's Note: This study was mainly supported by Procter and Gamble Company, including salary support for Dr. Luby. Procter and Gamble also supplied the soap for the study. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention contributed the personnel time of co-authors Drs. Painter and Hoekstra, and administrative support for the study.

For More Information: Contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations Department at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or email: mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org (please note new email address).

Go back to the top.


SPECIAL EMBARGO FOR RELEASE: 10 A.M. (ET) TUESDAY, June 1, 2004
Media Advisory: To contact Juan A. Rivera, Ph.D., call 011-52-777-311-2219 or email: jrivera{at}correo.insp.mx.

LARGE-SCALE INCENTIVE-BASED INTERVENTION WITH NUTRITIONAL COMPONENT IMPROVES HEALTH STATUS OF CHILDREN IN MEXICO

WASHINGTON, D.C.—An incentive-based program that now reaches 4.5 million families in Mexico is associated with lowering the rate of anemia and improving growth in low-income, rural infants and children, according to a study in the June 2 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), a theme issue on Global Health.

Lead author Juan A. Rivera, Ph.D., Director of the Center for Nutrition and Health, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico, presented the findings of the study today at a JAMA media briefing at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C.

According to background information in the article, more than half of the yearly 10.8 million deaths of children younger than 5 years worldwide are attributed to malnutrition. Malnourished children who survive have a high risk of impaired health and function throughout life, which contributes to the intergenerational continuation of poverty. In developing countries more than one-quarter of all children younger than 5 years, about 150 million total, are estimated to be malnourished. Existing malnutrition interventions are effective under controlled conditions; however, little information is available on their effectiveness in large-scale programs.

Rivera and colleagues conducted a study to determine the short-term nutritional impact of the large-scale, incentive-based development welfare program in Mexico, Progresa (Program for Education, Health, and Nutrition, currently called Oportunidades). Progresa has been applied by the Mexican federal government since 1997. As part of the program, children and pregnant and lactating women in participating households received fortified nutrition supplements called papilla, and the families received nutrition education, health care, and cash transfers.

The families received the cash transfers if they complied with requirements concerning school attendance and maintaining certain health care appointments for services such as immunizations, well baby care and growth monitoring of children, prenatal and postnatal care, check-up visits for other family members, and a mandatory session on nutrition and health education.

The study included 347 communities randomly assigned to immediate incorporation to the program in 1998 (intervention group; n = 205) or to incorporation in 1999 (crossover intervention group; n=142). A random sample of infants in those communities was surveyed at baseline and at 1 and 2 years afterward. Participants were from low-income households in poor rural communities in 6 central Mexican states. Infants (N = 650) 12 months of age or younger (n = 373 intervention group; n = 277 crossover intervention group) were included in the analyses.

The researchers found that participating in the Progresa program was associated with better growth in height among the poorest and younger infants. Adjusted height was greater by 1.1 cm (.4 inch) (26.4 cm [10.4 inches] in the intervention group vs. 25.3 cm [9.9 inches] in the crossover intervention group) among infants younger than 6 months at baseline. The rate of anemia in 1999 was 10.6 percentage points lower in the intervention group (44.3 percent) after 1 year in the Progresa program relative to that in the crossover intervention group (54.9 percent), who had not yet received Progresa benefits that year. In 2000, rates of anemia in the two groups were no longer significantly different after both groups had been in the program during the previous year.

"This experimental study showed improvements in height increments and anemia rates associated with exposure to Progresa, a program with a nutrition component, which covered about 2.6 million families by the end of the evaluation period and that today reaches 4.5 million families [about 20 percent of all families in Mexico]. The randomized design of the study allowed us to attribute the biologically important differences between intervention groups to the effect of the program. This evaluation is important because it is one of the few well-controlled effectiveness evaluations of large-scale programs that showed positive effects on nutrition and that also promises to support informed program improvements," the authors conclude.
(
JAMA. 2004;291:2563-2570. Available post-embargo at jama.com)

Editor's Note: The study was funded by the Mexican Ministry of Health (Dr. Rivera).

For More Information: Contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations Department at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or email: mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org

Go back to the top.


SPECIAL EMBARGO FOR RELEASE: 10 A.M. (ET) TUESDAY, June 1, 2004
Media Advisory: To contact Ronald C. Kessler, Ph.D., call John Lacey at 617-432-0441.

WORLD MENTAL HEALTH SURVEYS FIND MENTAL DISORDERS HIGHLY PREVALENT AND OFTEN UNTREATED

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Reallocation of treatment resources could substantially decrease the problem of unmet need for treatment of mental disorders among serious cases in developed and developing countries, according to the findings from The World Health Organization (WHO) World Mental Health Surveys published in the June 2 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), a theme issue on Global Health.

Ronald C. Kessler, Ph.D., from Harvard Medical School, Boston, presented the findings from the study today at a JAMA media briefing held at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C.

Co-Principal Investigators of the Survey, Dr. Kessler and Dr. T. Bedirhan Üstün from the World Health Organization, together with co-authors from The WHO World Mental Health Survey Consortium analyzed data from 60,463 face-to-face household surveys with adults in 14 countries (6 less developed, 8 developed) to estimate the prevalence, severity, and treatment of mental disorders. The surveys were conducted from 2001 - 2003 in the Americas (Columbia, Mexico, United States), Europe (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Ukraine), the Middle East and Africa (Lebanon, Nigeria), and Asia (Japan, separate surveys in Beijing and Shanghai in the People's Republic of China). The six countries classified as less developed by the World Bank are China, Colombia, Lebanon, Mexico, Nigeria, and Ukraine.

All surveys used the World Mental Health -Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI), a structured diagnostic interview to assess disorders and treatment. Disorders considered included anxiety disorders, mood disorders, disorders that share a feature of problems with impulse control (for example, bulimia [episodic binge eating followed by compensatory behaviors]), and substance abuse disorders.

The researchers found that the prevalence of having any mental disorder in the prior year varied widely from 4.3 percent in Shanghai to 26.4 percent in the United States. "Between 33.1 percent (Columbia) and 80.9 percent (Nigeria) of 12-month cases were mild," the researchers report. "Serious disorders were associated with substantial role disability [inability to carry out usual activities]. Although disorder severity was correlated with probability of treatment in almost all countries, 35.5 percent to 50.3 percent of serious cases in developed countries and 76.3 percent to 85.4 percent in less-developed countries received no treatment in the 12 months before the interview." The authors continue, "Due to the high prevalence of mild and subthreshold cases, the number of those who received treatment far exceeds the number of untreated serious cases in every country." The term "subthreshold case" refers to people who received treatment even though they did not meet full criteria for a mental disorder.

"The fact that many people with subthreshold disorders are treated while many with serious disorders are not shows that unmet need for treatment among serious cases is not merely a matter of limited treatment resources but that misallocation of treatment resources is also involved," the authors comment. "To the extent that early intervention can prevent progression, early treatment might be cost effective. It is difficult to act on this insight, however, because we lack good information either about the characteristics of mild cases that predict risk of progression to more serious disorders or about the effectiveness of interventions for mild cases in preventing this progression. A new focus on development and evaluation of secondary prevention programs for the early treatment of mild cases is needed to guide rationalization of treatment resource allocation," the authors conclude.
(
JAMA. 2004;291:2581-2590. Available post-embargo at jama.com)

Editor's Note: Please see the JAMA paper for funding information.

For More Information: Contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations Department at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or email: mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org

Go back to the top.


SPECIAL EMBARGO FOR RELEASE: 10 A.M. (ET) TUESDAY, June 1, 2004
Media Advisory: To contact Derek Yach, M.B.Ch.B., M.P.H., call David Porter at 011-41-791-2111 or email: porterd{at}who.int.

CHRONIC DISEASES NEED GLOBAL HEALTH ATTENTION

WASHINGTON, D.C.—The rising global burden of chronic diseases needs a coordinated effort from policy makers, advocates and health professionals, according to a special communication in the June 2 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), a theme issue on Global Health.

Derek Yach, M.B.Ch.B., M.P.H., from the World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, presented the special communication today at a JAMA media briefing at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C.

According to background information provided by the authors: "Chronic diseases are the largest cause of death in the world, led by cardiovascular disease (17 million deaths in 2002, mainly from ischemic heart disease and stroke) and followed by cancer (7 million deaths), and chronic lung diseases (4 million), and diabetes mellitus (almost 1 million). These leading diseases share key risk factors: tobacco use, unhealthful diets, lack of physical activity, and alcohol use."

Yach and colleagues write that the "global prevalence of all the leading chronic diseases is increasing, with the majority occurring in developing countries and projected to increase substantially over the next 2 decades." The authors note that "between 1990 and 2020, mortality [death] from ischemic heart disease in developing countries is expected to increase by 120 percent for women and 137 percent for men." The authors add that risks for chronic diseases are also rising with higher rates of smoking and obesity levels among adolescents in developing countries.

"Chronic diseases have not simply displaced acute infectious ones in developing countries. Rather, such countries now experience a polarized and protracted double burden of disease. India, the second most populous country, has the highest number of diabetics in the world and annual coronary deaths are expected to reach 2 million by 2010. At the same time, around 2.5 million children in India die from infections such as pneumonia, diarrhea, and malaria every year. In South Africa, infectious diseases account for 28 percent of years of lives lost while chronic diseases account for 25 percent." The authors add that the health services in these countries are being strained by the double burden.

"In most developing countries inadequate financing and lack of manpower to address chronic diseases have been major impediments to chronic disease control." The authors continue, "Many key decision makers still believe chronic diseases afflict only the affluent and the elderly and arise only from freely acquired risks and that their control is ineffective and too expensive and should wait until infectious diseases are addressed." The authors point out that "chronic diseases in developing countries are not just diseases of the elderly, since cardiovascular disease accounts for as many deaths in young and middle-aged adults as HIV/AIDS. Also, in developing countries chronic diseases affect a much higher proportion of people during their prime working years than in developed countries."

The authors write that "decision makers need to be fully informed with the up-to-date evidence about the burden and impacts of chronic disease." They add that health systems need to be realigned to accommodate diagnosis and prevention of chronic diseases. Policy leaders need to encourage transnational corporations to improve health while also putting into place new business models, and encourage creation of codes and incentives for healthy foreign investment. Coordinated and focused emphasis on chronic disease prevention with intensified attention to tobacco, unhealthy diets and physical activity, "is essential to address the enormity of the burden of those who now survive beyond childhood around the world," the authors conclude.
(
JAMA. 2004;291:2616-2622. Available post-embargo at jama.com)

For More Information: Contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations Department at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or email: mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org

Go back to the top.


JAMA VIDEO NEWS REPORT

HAND-WASHING DRAMATICALLY REDUCES RISK OF DEATH FROM DIARRHEA AMONG CHILDREN - PLAIN SOAP AS EFFECTIVE AS ANTIBACTERIAL SOAP

VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Pan - goat in street
Flies on food
Boys playing near garbage
Garbage-strewn streets
Woman washing hands


AUDIO:
THIS IS KARACHI, PAKISTAN. FLIES BUZZ AROUND FOOD PREPARATION. CHILDREN PLAY IN SEWAGE-STREWN STREETS. POVERTY, POOR SANITATION AND CONTAMINATED DRINKING WATER LEAD TO LIFE-THREATENING CASES OF DIARRHEA. RESEARCHERS HAVE LONG KNOWN THAT HAND-WASHING CAN HELP PREVENT THE SPREAD OF DISEASE, BUT THEY HAD ANOTHER QUESTION.

VIDEO:
SOT/FULL
@ :19
Super: Stephen Luby, M.D., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Runs :15


AUDIO:
"Whether the children who are at highest risk of death from diarrhea, children who live in poor communities, children who have contaminated drinking water, and who are malnourished, and children who are very young, whether they would benefit from washing hands."

VIDEO:
GFX/JAMA COVER
Dr. Luby and colleague at computer
People washing hands in Pakistan
More hand-washing
Children eating on floor - flies buzzing around


AUDIO:
THAT QUESTION IS ANSWERED IN A SPECIAL GLOBAL HEALTH THEME ISSUE OF THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION. DR. STEPHEN LUBY (LOO-bee) AND COLLEAGUES FROM THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, FROM TWO HEALTH INITIATIVES IN PAKISTAN, AND FROM SOAP-MAKER PROCTER AND GAMBLE, STUDIED NINE-HUNDRED EXTREMELY POOR HOUSEHOLDS IN KARACHI. SIX-HUNDRED HOUSEHOLDS RECEIVED SOAP - HALF GOT PLAIN SOAP AND HALF GOT ANTIBACTERIAL SOAP. ALL RECEIVED HAND-WASHING INSTRUCTION AND ENCOURAGEMENT. THE REMAINING THREE-HUNDRED HOUSEHOLDS RECEIVED SCHOOL SUPPLIES INSTEAD OF SOAP.

VIDEO:
SOT/FULL
Stephen Luby, M.D., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Runs :15


AUDIO:
"When we got everybody washing their hands in the household, not only did they interrupt transmission of these germs into their mouths, but they even protected the children, the very young and the vulnerable, who were not able to wash their hands."

VIDEO:
B-ROLL
People washing hands
Baby in bath
Toddler in bath


AUDIO:
IN FACT, THE HAND-WASHING HOUSEHOLDS SAW A 50-PERCENT REDUCTION IN CASES OF DIARRHEA. EVEN THE MOST VULNERABLE TO DISEASE - INFANTS AND MALNOURISHED CHILDREN, SAW ABOUT A FORTY-PERCENT REDUCTION IN DIARRHEA, EVEN IF THEY COULDN'T WASH THEIR OWN HANDS. AND THE KIND OF SOAP DIDN'T MAKE A DIFFERENCE.

VIDEO:
SOT/FULL
Stephen Luby, M.D., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Runs :09


AUDIO:
"What we found is that people who washed their hands with plain soap had the same reduction in diarrheal disease as compared to people who washed their hands with antibacterial soap."

VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Woman washing hands, then preparing food
5:30 and 6:18


AUDIO:
WHAT MATTERED WAS REGULAR HAND-WASHING TO PREVENT THE SPREAD OF THE GERMS THAT CAUSE DIARRHEA.
THIS IS MAVIS PRALL REPORTING.

HOME | EMBARGOED CONTENT | PAST ISSUES | EVENTS | HELP | SEARCH RELEASES
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.