JAMA & ARCHIVES
JAMA & Archives
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  EMBARGOED CONTENT  PAST ISSUES  EVENTS  HELP  SEARCH RELEASES


September 14, 2004

JAMA news releases are made available to the public after 3 pm US Central time on the first 4 Tuesdays of each month. The Archives Journals news releases are made available to the public after 3 pm Central time on Mondays. We also provide a list of previous news releases.

THIS WEEK'S CONTENT

JAMA NEWS RELEASES
(Embargoed for Release: 3 p.m. CT, Tuesday, September 14, 2004)


JAMA NEWS RELEASES

>   COMPARED TO OTHER SCREENING METHODS, MRI APPEARS MORE EFFECTIVE FOR DETECTING BREAST CANCER FOR WOMEN WITH BREAST CANCER GENE MUTATIONS

>   USE OF BETA-BLOCKERS ASSOCIATED WITH DECREASED RISK FOR FRACTURES

>   NUMBER OF FLU-ASSOCIATED HOSPITALIZATIONS ON THE RISE, ESPECIALLY FOR ELDERLY


INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THESE NEWS RELEASES IS PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT. JOURNAL ATTRIBUTION IS REQUIRED.

TV Note: This week's JAMA video news release is on the estimated number of flu-associated hospitalizations in the last 20 years. The release will be fed Tuesday, September 14, from 9:00 - 9:30 a.m. ET on Intelsat America 6 (formerly Telstar 6), Transponder 11 (C-Band) and from 2:00 - 2:30 p.m. ET on Intelsat America 6, Transponder 11 (C-Band). For more information, call 312/464-JAMA (5262).

Please Note: Our e-mail has changed to mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org

JOURNALISTS CAN NOW ACCESS EMBARGOED JAMA/ARCHIVES STUDIES ONLINE

Go to www.jamamedia.org for more information and to apply for access.

Please Note: The FOR THE MEDIA Web site now has a search feature to enable media to find previous JAMA/Archives news releases on specific medical topics. This search feature link is located on the home page at www.jamamedia.org

Embargoed for Release: 3 p.m. CT, TUESDAY, September 14, 2004
Media Advisory: To contact Ellen Warner, M.D., call Fiona Taylor at 416-480-6100, ext. 2663. To contact editorial authors Mark E. Robson, M.D., or Kenneth Offit, M.D., M.P.H., call Joanne Nicholas at 212-639-3573.

COMPARED TO OTHER SCREENING METHODS, MRI APPEARS MORE EFFECTIVE FOR DETECTING BREAST CANCER FOR WOMEN WITH BREAST CANCER GENE MUTATIONS

CHICAGO—MRI is more accurate for detecting breast cancer than mammography, ultrasound or clinical breast examination alone, in women who carry the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation, according to a study in the September 15 issue of JAMA.

Women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations who do not undergo prophylactic surgery have a lifetime risk of breast cancer of up to 85 percent, with a significantly higher risk of breast cancer than the general population from age 25 years onward, according to background information in the article. Current recommendations for women who have a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation are to undergo breast surveillance from age 25 years onward with mammography annually and clinical breast examination (CBE) every 6 months; however, many tumors are detected at a relatively advanced stage. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound may improve the ability to detect breast cancer at an early stage.

Ellen Warner, M.D., of Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and colleagues compared the sensitivity and specificity of four methods of breast cancer surveillance (mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and CBE) in women with hereditary susceptibility to breast cancer due to a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

The study included 236 women aged 25 to 65 years with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations who underwent 1 to 3 annual screening examinations, consisting of MRI, mammography, and ultrasound at a teaching hospital between November 1997 and March 2003. On the day of imaging and at 6-month intervals, CBE was performed.

During the study period, there were 22 cancers detected (16 invasive and 6 ductal carcinoma in situ). Of these, 17 (77 percent) were detected by MRI vs. 8 (36 percent) by mammography, 7 (33 percent) by ultrasound, and 2 (9.1 percent) by CBE. All 4 screening modalities combined had a sensitivity of 95 percent vs. 45 percent for mammography and CBE combined.

"This study of 236 BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers demonstrates that the addition of annual MRI and ultrasound to mammography and CBE significantly improves the sensitivity of surveillance for detecting early breast cancers," the authors write. "...our results support the position that MRI-based screening is likely to become the cornerstone of breast cancer surveillance for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, but it is necessary to demonstrate that this surveillance tool lowers breast cancer mortality before it can be recommended for general use."
(
JAMA. 2004;292:1317-1325. Available post-embargo at jama.com)

Editor's Note: This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance, The Terry Fox Foundation, and funding from the International Breast MRI Consortium, the (Canadian) National Breast Cancer Fund, and the Papoff Family. The MRI contrast agent was supplied by GE Healthcare.

EDITORIAL: BREAST MRI FOR WOMEN WITH HEREDITARY CANCER RISK

In an accompanying editorial, Mark E. Robson, M.D., and Kenneth Offit, M.D., M.P.H., of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, write that Warner et al have clearly documented the risks and benefits of breast MRI screening in women at the highest levels of hereditary risk.

"Their findings, in combination with those of [another recent study], strongly suggest that women with BRCA mutations should be offered such screening. Women and their physicians must, however, be aware that both sensitivity and specificity of screening MRI may be substantially less than described if different imaging protocols are followed or if experienced radiologists and suitable technology, including the capability to perform magnetic resonance-guided biopsies, are not available.

"A technology assessment by one large insurance carrier has already supported the rationale for MRI screening of BRCA mutation carriers and other women at high hereditary risk for breast cancer, even in the absence of a randomized controlled trial demonstrating a mortality benefit. Remaining questions, largely centered on specificity, recall rate, and positive predictive value, argue against routine application of MRI screening for women at lesser degrees of risk without carefully designed studies, preferably randomized controlled trials, delineating test performance in those specific populations," the authors conclude.
(JAMA. 2004;292:1368-1370. Available post-embargo at jama.com)

For More Information: Contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations Department at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or email: mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org (please note new email address).

Go back to the top.


Embargoed for Release: 3 p.m. CT, TUESDAY, September 14, 2004
Media Advisory: To contact corresponding author Christoph R. Meier, Ph.D., M.Sc., email: meierch{at}uhbs.ch.

USE OF BETA-BLOCKERS ASSOCIATED WITH DECREASED RISK FOR FRACTURES

CHICAGO—Patients who take beta-blocker medications appear to have a reduced risk for bone fractures, according to a study in the September 15 issue of JAMA.

According to background information in the article, animal studies have suggested that the beta-blocker propranolol increases bone formation, but data are limited on any associated reduced risk of fracture in humans.

Raymond G. Schlienger, Ph.D., M.P.H., of the University of Basel, Switzerland, and colleagues examined the association between beta-blocker use, with or without use of thiazide diuretics, and bone fracture risk in men and women aged 30 to 79 years. Researchers analyzed data from the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD). The study included 30,601 patients with a new fracture diagnosis between 1993 and 1999 and 120,819 controls, matched to cases on age and sex and other factors.

The researchers found that compared with patients who did not use either beta-blockers or thiazide diuretics, patients who used only beta-blockers (3 or more prescriptions, about six months or longer) had a 23 percent lower risk for fracture, a 20 percent lower risk for fracture with use of thiazides only (3 or more prescriptions), and for combined use of beta-blockers and thiazides, a 29 percent lower risk.

"In summary, the present large case-control analysis provides evidence that use of beta-blockers-alone or in combination with thiazide diuretics-is associated with a significantly decreased fracture risk. The association in long-term users was weaker in women than in men in the current study population. Although additional observational studies and controlled trials are needed to confirm these potentially important findings, many elderly patients with hypertension are at risk of developing osteoporosis, and they may potentially profit from positive effects of the relatively inexpensive beta-blockers and thiazide diuretics on fracture risk," the authors write.
(
JAMA. 2004;292:1326-1332. Available post-embargo at jama.com)

Editor's Note: Co-author Dr. Meier is the recipient of a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation.

For More Information: Contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations Department at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or email: mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org

Go back to the top.


Embargoed for Release: 3 p.m. CT, TUESDAY, September 14, 2004
Media Advisory: To contact William W. Thompson, Ph.D., call Curtis Allen at 404-639-8487.

NUMBER OF FLU-ASSOCIATED HOSPITALIZATIONS ON THE RISE, ESPECIALLY FOR ELDERLY

CHICAGO—The estimated number of influenza-associated hospitalizations among elderly patients has increased substantially over the past two decades, according to an article in the September 15 issue of JAMA.

Although national estimates of influenza-associated deaths have been important in understanding the epidemiology of influenza over time and in planning for future epidemics and pandemics, "mortality incompletely reflects the severity of influenza infections because many severe illnesses do not result in death," according to background information in the article.

William W. Thompson, Ph.D., of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, and colleagues estimated the annual average number of hospitalizations associated with the circulation of the influenza virus over two decades. The researchers used data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS) and World Health Organization Collaborating Laboratories to make estimates for the influenza seasons during 1979 - 1980 through 2000 - 2001.

The researchers analyzed hospitalizations in several different ways and found there were 226,054 primary and 294,128 any listed respiratory and circulatory hospitalizations associated with influenza virus infections on average each season (and annual averages of 94,735 primary and 133,900 any listed pneumonia and influenza hospitalizations associated with the influenza virus infections). Highest rates of influenza-associated primary respiratory and circulatory hospitalizations were found in persons 85 years and older.

After adjusting for length of each influenza season, influenza-associated rates of primary pneumonia and influenza hospitalizations increased over time among elderly. There were no significant increases in the rates of influenza-associated primary respiratory and circulatory hospitalizations after adjusting for the length of the influenza season. Children younger than five years had rates similar to those found among the 50 through 64 year-old age group. Persons aged five years through 49 years had the lowest rates of hospitalizations associated with influenza.

The authors write: "Currently, we estimate that more than 200,000 respiratory and circulatory hospitalizations are associated with influenza each year in the United States, substantially more than estimates of pneumonia and influenza hospitalizations."

They conclude by saying: "Significant numbers of influenza-associated hospitalizations in the United States occur among the elderly, and the numbers of these hospitalizations have increased substantially over the last two decades due in part to the aging of the population. ...These findings highlight the need for improved influenza prevention efforts for both young and older U.S. residents."
(
JAMA. 2004;292:1333-1340. Available post-embargo at jama.com)

For More Information: Contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations Department at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or email: mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org

Go back to the top.


JAMA VIDEO NEWS REPORT

ANNUAL NUMBER OF FLU-RELATED HOSPITALIZATIONS IN THE U.S. HIGHER THAN PREVIOUSLY ESTIMATED

VIDEO:
NAT SOT UP FULL FOR :03
Baby crying receiving vaccination


AUDIO:
"Waaaaaa."

VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Baby crying from receiving vaccination
GFX/JAMA COVER


AUDIO:
NO ONE LIKES TO GET A SHOT, BUT GETTING A FLU SHOT THIS COMING INFLUENZA SEASON MAY BE MORE IMPORTANT THAN EVER, ACCORDING TO A NEW STUDY IN JAMA, THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION.

VIDEO:
SOT/FULL
@ :13
Super: William Thompson, Ph.D., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Runs :16


AUDIO:
"We found that influenza was associated with over 200,000 hospitalizations annually. We also found that influenza-associated hospitalizations increased from 1979 through 2001, in large part due to the aging of the population."

VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Dr. Thompson walking down hall
Elderly people in clinic waiting room


FULL SCREEN GRAPHIC:
Title: At risk of flu-related hospitalization
People age 50 and older
People with weak immune systems
People with certain chronic conditions
Children age 5 and under

AUDIO:
DR. WILLIAM THOMPSON AND COLLEAGUES AT THE U.S. CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION ANALYZED NATIONAL HEALTH AND HOSPITAL DISCHARGE DATA FROM 1979 TO 2001. DR. THOMPSON SAYS PEOPLE AGE 85 AND OLDER WERE AT GREATER RISK FOR FLU-RELATED HOSPITALIZATION THAN YOUNGER PEOPLE, THOUGH THEY'RE NOT THE ONLY ONES AT RISK. IN FACT, THOSE AT GREATEST RISK INCLUDE PEOPLE AGE 50 AND OLDER, PEOPLE WITH WEAKENED IMMUNE SYSTEMS OR CERTAIN CHRONIC CONDITIONS, AND CHILDREN FROM SIX MONTHS TO FIVE YEARS OF AGE.

VIDEO:
SOT/FULL
William Thompson, Ph.D., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Runs :14


AUDIO:
"Children were hospitalized for shorter lengths of stay, roughly 3 to 4 days on average, while older individuals were more likely to be hospitalized for longer periods of time, on average, 7 to 8 days."

VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Ambulance
Person in ambulance


AUDIO:
THE RESEARCHERS ALSO FOUND THAT THERE ARE MORE SEVERE STRAINS OF FLU AFFECTING AMERICANS THAN IN THE PAST. AND THAT'S NOT ALL.

VIDEO:
SOT/FULL second half of bite covered with video of people walking outside in cold weather
William Thompson, Ph.D., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Runs :16


AUDIO:
"Now we're finding that as well as the increased number of hospitalizations in the United States, we're also seeing that the influenza season is lasting longer." "The length is going from a period of about 8 weeks in length to 12 weeks in length."

VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Nurse pushing patient in wheeled hospital bed
SOT/FULL 19:01-:06
William Thompson, Ph.D., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Runs :05


AUDIO:
DR. THOMPSON HAS THIS ADVICE.
"These findings highlight why people should get vaccinated with the flu vaccine."

VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Man being vaccinated


AUDIO:
THIS IS MAVIS PRALL REPORTING.

HOME | EMBARGOED CONTENT | PAST ISSUES | EVENTS | HELP | SEARCH RELEASES
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.