JAMA & ARCHIVES
JAMA & Archives
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  EMBARGOED CONTENT  PAST ISSUES  EVENTS  HELP  SEARCH RELEASES


November 2, 2004

JAMA news releases are made available to the public after 3 pm US Central time on the first 4 Tuesdays of each month. The Archives Journals news releases are made available to the public after 3 pm Central time on Mondays. We also provide a list of previous news releases.

THIS WEEK'S CONTENT

JAMA NEWS RELEASES
(Embargoed for Release: 3 p.m. CT, Tuesday, November 2, 2004)


JAMA NEWS RELEASES

>   ANNUAL VACCINATION AGAINST INFLUENZA ASSOCIATED WITH DECREASED RISK OF DEATH IN ELDERLY

>   STUDY LOOKS AT EVENTS THAT LEAD TO DISABILITY AMONG THE ELDERLY

>   LESS RISKS FOR PATIENTS PARTICIPATING IN EARLY PHASE CANCER DRUG TRIALS


INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THESE NEWS RELEASES IS PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT. JOURNAL ATTRIBUTION IS REQUIRED.

TV Note: This week's JAMA video news release is on annual vaccination against the flu being associated with a decreased risk of death in the elderly. The release will be fed Tuesday, November 2, from 9:00 - 9:30 a.m. ET on Intelsat America 6 (formerly Telstar 6), Transponder 11 (C-Band) and from 2:00 - 2:30 p.m. ET on Intelsat America 6, Transponder 11 (C-Band). For more information, call 312/464-JAMA (5262).

Please Note: Our e-mail has changed to mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org

JOURNALISTS CAN NOW ACCESS EMBARGOED JAMA/ARCHIVES STUDIES ONLINE

Go to www.jamamedia.org for more information and to apply for access.

Please Note: The FOR THE MEDIA Web site now has a search feature to enable media to find previous JAMA/Archives news releases on specific medical topics. This search feature link is located on the home page at www.jamamedia.org

Embargoed for Release: 3 p.m. CT, TUESDAY, November 2, 2004
Media Advisory: To contact corresponding author Bruno H. Ch. Stricker, M.B., Ph.D., email: b.stricker{at}erasmusmc.nl

ANNUAL VACCINATION AGAINST INFLUENZA ASSOCIATED WITH DECREASED RISK OF DEATH IN ELDERLY

CHICAGO—A study from the Netherlands suggests that elderly persons who receive a yearly influenza vaccination have reduced risk of death from all causes, according to a study in the November 3 issue of JAMA.

"Influenza-associated morbidity and mortality increase with age, especially for individuals with high-risk conditions," the authors provide as background information in the article. "The effectiveness of vaccination has been reported to decrease in high-risk persons. Annual influenza revaccination has been proposed as a strategy to increase vaccination effectiveness."

In this study, A.C.G. Voordouw, M.D., from Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, and colleagues, analyzed data from 1996 through 2002 from electronic patient records that were part of the Integrated Primary Care Information Project of Medical Informatics at the Erasmus Medical Center. The study included 26,071 persons aged 65 years or older. During the total study period, the population studied received 62,476 influenza vaccinations. The annual vaccination coverage ranged from 64 percent in 1996 to 74 percent in 1999. Influenza epidemics during the study period were of mild to moderate severity with the 2000 - 2001 season showing no clear epidemic activity.

During the study followup period, 3,485 patients died. "Overall, a first vaccination was associated with a nonsignificant annual reduction of mortality (death) risk of 10 percent, while revaccination was associated with a reduced mortality risk of 24 percent," the authors report. "Compared with a first vaccination, revaccination was associated with a reduced annual mortality risk of 15 percent. During the epidemic periods this reduction was 28 percent." The authors also found that an interruption of the annual vaccinations series was associated with a 25 percent increase in mortality risk, whereas restarting vaccination after an interruption resulted in a mortality risk reduction similar to that observed following revaccination. The authors note that "in the total population one death was prevented for every 302 vaccinations, or 1 for every 195 revaccinations."

"In summary, our study shows that annual revaccination against influenza in a population of community-dwelling elderly persons is associated with a reduction of mortality risk. This study supports the recommendation for yearly influenza vaccination for elderly individuals, not only for those with comorbid illness but also in those without comorbidity and in patients 80 years or older. Because influenza vaccination is inexpensive and safe, clinicians should recommend annual influenza revaccination for such patients."
(
JAMA. 2004;292:2089-2095. Available post-embargo at jama.com)

Editor's Note: This study was supported by an unconditional grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development. The grant was obtained following review of a submitted protocol to evaluate the effectiveness of the influenza vaccination program in Dutch elderly citizens. [Co-author] Dr. D. J. Smith was supported by a European Union grant.

For More Information: Contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations Department at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or email: mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org (please note new email address).

Go back to the top.


Embargoed for Release: 3 p.m. CT, TUESDAY, November 2, 2004
Media Advisory: To contact Thomas M. Gill, M.D., call Karen Peart at 203-432-1326.

STUDY LOOKS AT EVENTS THAT LEAD TO DISABILITY AMONG THE ELDERLY

CHICAGO—Illnesses and injuries leading to either hospitalization or restricted activity are strongly associated with the development of disability for older persons living in the community, regardless of their physical condition, according to a study in the November 3 issue of JAMA.

The authors provide as background information that while the prevalence of disability is decreasing, there are currently more than 7 million chronically disabled individuals aged 65 years or older in the United States. "Disability is associated with increased mortality and leads to additional adverse outcomes, such as nursing home placement and greater use of formal and informal home services, all of which place a substantial burden on older persons, informal caregivers, and health care resources. In the aggregate, the additional cost of medical and long-term care for newly disabled U.S. elderly individuals is estimated to be $26 billion per year."

Thomas M. Gill, M.D., and colleagues from Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn., assessed 754 people aged 70 years or older, who were not disabled (not requiring personal assistance) in four essential activities of daily living: bathing, dressing, walking inside the house, and transferring from a chair. Participants were categorized into 2 groups according to the presence of physical frailty and were followed up with monthly telephone interviews for up to 5 years to determine exposure to intervening events (illnesses or injuries) and the occurrence of disability.

"During the 5-year follow-up period, disability developed among 417 (55.3 percent) participants, 372 (49.3 percent) were hospitalized and 600 (79.6 percent) had at least one episode of restricted activity," the authors found. "...participants who developed disability were significantly more likely to have been hospitalized or to have had restricted activity than those who did not develop disability."

"In absolute terms, illnesses and injuries leading to hospitalization accounted for about 50 percent to 80 percent of the disability outcomes. Another 5 percent to 19 percent of the disability outcomes were attributable to illnesses and injuries leading to restricted activity but not to hospitalization. Depending on the specific disability outcome, the risk of disability was elevated more than 5-fold in the setting of restricted activity." The authors add that "falls and fall-related injuries resulting in hospitalization or restricted activity conferred the highest risk of disability..."

"The results of the current study highlight the importance of intervening events as a potential target for the prevention of disability, regardless of the presence of physical frailty," the authors write. "In the setting of an acute illness or injury leading to hospitalization, functional outcomes are improved by management of older persons on specialized inpatient services and, posthospitalization, by highly coordinated gerocentric care provided in the home."
(
JAMA. 2004;292:2115-2124. Available post-embargo at jama.com)

Editor's Note: The work for this article was funded by a grant from the National Institute on Aging and grants from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Paul Beeson Physician Faculty Scholar in Aging Research Program, and Patrick and Catherine Weldon Donaghue Medical Research Foundation. The study was conducted at the Yale Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center. Dr. Gill is the recipient of a Midcareer Investigator Award in Patient-Oriented Research from the National Institute on Aging.

For More Information: Contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations Department at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or email: mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org

Go back to the top.


Embargoed for Release: 3 p.m. CT, TUESDAY, November 2, 2004
Media Advisory: To contact Thomas G. Roberts, Jr., M.D., M.Soc.Sci., call Sue McGreevey at 617-724-2764. To contact editorialist Ian F. Tannock, M.D., Ph.D., call Jennifer Kohm at 416-946-2846.

LESS RISKS FOR PATIENTS PARTICIPATING IN EARLY PHASE CANCER DRUG TRIALS

CHICAGO—The risk of treatment-related (toxic) death for cancer patients enrolled in phase 1 clinical trials had decreased significantly over the past 12 years (from 1991 to 2002), according to an article in the November 3 issue of JAMA.

This year, more than 550,000 Americans will die from cancer, and this number is expected to increase as the population ages, according to background information in the article. Efforts to develop new therapies have never been greater. There are more than 550 phase 1 trials open to cancer patients in the United States at any given time, and the numbers are steadily increasing as more products of the biotech industry reach the clinic. Phase 1 clinical trials represent the first testing of an investigational agent in humans. The major objectives during phase 1 are to characterize the agent's toxicity profile and to determine a dose and schedule appropriate for phase 2 testing. Patients who chose to participate may experience significant risks with limited chance to benefit.

Over the last decade, cancer drugs under development have become more targeted, and the clinical research environment has become more scrutinized. The impact of these changes on the risks and benefits to patients who participate in phase 1 cancer trials has been unknown.

Thomas G. Roberts, Jr., M.D., M.Soc.Sci., of Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, and colleagues conducted a study to determine if trends in the rates of objective response, treatment-related death, and serious toxicity in phase 1 cancer trials have changed over time. The authors searched abstracts and journal articles reporting the results of phase 1 cancer treatment trials originally submitted to annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) from 1991 through 2002.

The researchers found that the overall toxic death rate for 213 studies (involving 6,474 cancer patients) published in peer-reviewed journals was 0.54 percent, while the overall objective response rate was 3.8 percent. Toxic death rates decreased over the study period, from 1.1 percent over the first 4 years of the study (1991-1994) to 0.06 percent over the most recent 4-year period (1999-2002). Response rates also decreased, but by proportionally much less. After adjusting for characteristics of the experimental trials and the investigational agents, the odds of a patient dying from an experimental treatment while participating in a trial submitted during the most recent 4-year period were less than one-tenth those of a patient participating in a trial submitted during the first 4-year period. In comparison, the adjusted odds of a patient experiencing an objective response over the same time periods decreased by approximately half.

"There are several potential explanations for the sharp decline in treatment-related deaths. First, almost half (47 percent) of the trials in our detailed analysis involved the testing of targeted/biologic agents, which tend to have more favorable toxicity profiles compared with the [toxic to cells] drugs that have dominated cancer drug development in the past," the authors write. "The introduction of better supportive care over the study period ...are likely to have played a positive role."
(
JAMA. 2004;292:2130-2140. Available post-embargo at jama.com)

Editor's Note: For funding and disclosure information, please see the JAMA article.

EDITORIAL: RISKS AND BENEFITS OF PHASE 1 CLINICAL TRIALS EVALUATING NEW ANTI-CANCER AGENTS - A CASE FOR MORE INNOVATION

In an accompanying editorial, Eric X. Chen, M.D., Ph.D., and Ian F. Tannock, M.D., Ph.D., of Princess Margaret Hospital and the University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, emphasize the need for more innovation in the design of phase 1 clinical trials.

"With an ever-increasing number of molecular targeted agents entering clinical trials, end points based on changes in target expression, pharmacokinetics, and functional imaging should be incorporated into phase 1 studies," the authors write. "The appropriate dose for a molecular targeted agent is not necessarily the highest tolerated; it is the dose that effectively inhibits the molecular target in tumor cells. Unfortunately, recent reviews indicate that the majority of phase 1 studies continue to use traditional study designs, and toxicity remains the primary outcome measure for determining the recommended phase 2 dose."

"The study by Roberts et al is a timely reminder that investigators should be innovative in designing phase 1 studies. Only through these efforts will patient benefit be maximized, accrual increased, and effective new anti-cancer agents brought to clinical practice in a timely fashion," the editorialists conclude.
(JAMA. 2004;292:2150-2151. Available post-embargo at jama.com)

For More Information: Contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations Department at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or email: mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org

Go back to the top.


JAMA VIDEO NEWS REPORT

ANNUAL FLU REVACCINATION REDUCES RISK OF DEATH IN ELDERLY BY AT LEAST 24%

VIDEO:
SOT/FULL
@ :01
Super: Bettie Voordouw, M.D.
Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam
Runs :05


AUDIO:
"Influenza is a common disease which may be potentially fatal, especially in elderly."

VIDEO:
B-ROLL
File of elderly people waiting in clinic waiting room for flu shots
GFX/JAMA COVER


AUDIO:
BUT HOW IMPORTANT IS IT FOR ELDERLY PEOPLE TO BE REVACCINATED EVERY YEAR? THAT QUESTION IS ANSWERED IN A NEW STUDY IN JAMA, THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION.

VIDEO:
SOT/FULL
Bettie Voordouw, M.D.
Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam
Runs :11


AUDIO:
"There had not been any study before that investigated the relation between annual revaccination and mortality risk in this population."

VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Lab techs doing lab work at Erasmus Med. Center
File of elderly people walking on city sidewalks


AUDIO:
THAT'S WHY RESEARCHERS AT ERASMUS (er-AZ-muss) MEDICAL CENTER IN ROTTERDAM, THE NETHERLANDS, AND AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE IN ENGLAND, STUDIED THE HEALTH RECORDS OF 26-THOUSAND ELDERLY DUTCH FLU PATIENTS OVER THE COURSE OF SIX YEARS. THEY FOCUSED ON PEOPLE OVER AGE 65 WHO WERE COMMUNITY-DWELLING, MEANING NOT HOSPITALIZED.

VIDEO:
SOT/FULL
Bettie Voordouw, M.D.
Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam
Runs :14


AUDIO:
"The effect of revaccination was especially stronger in those individuals who were at higher age in the study."

VIDEO:
Full Screen
Graphic
Title: Flu Vaccination - Reduces Risk of Death
First Vaccination over age 65 - 10%
Revaccination over age 65 - 24%
Revaccination over age 80 - 31%
For every 200 revaccinations, 1 death prevented


AUDIO:
IN PEOPLE OVER AGE 65, A FIRST VACCINATION REDUCED THE RISK OF DEATH BY TEN PERCENT. A REVACCINATION REDUCED THE RISK BY 24 PERCENT, BUT THE OLDER THE PATIENT, THE GREATER THE REDUCTION. IN PEOPLE OVER AGE 80, FLU REVACCINATION REDUCED THE RISK OF DEATH BY 31 PERCENT. FOR EVERY TWO-HUNDRED ELDERLY PEOPLE WHO WERE REVACCINATED, ONE DEATH WAS PREVENTED.

VIDEO:
SOT/FULL
Bettie Voordouw, M.D.
Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam
Runs :08


AUDIO:
"Our study has shown that in these elderly, influenza vaccination is an effective means to reduce mortality risk."

VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Elderly man in Erasmus Medical Center hospital room receiving vaccine from male nurse


AUDIO:
IN THE NETHERLANDS, ABOUT 70 PERCENT OF THE ENTIRE ELDERLY POPULATION RECEIVE AN ANNUAL FLU SHOT THROUGH A GOVERNMENT PROGRAM. THE STUDY AUTHORS SAY SUCH REVACCINATION PROGRAMS HAVE PROVEN TO SAVE LIVES.
THIS IS MAVIS PRALL REPORTING.

HOME | EMBARGOED CONTENT | PAST ISSUES | EVENTS | HELP | SEARCH RELEASES
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.