(Embargoed Until: 3 P.M. (CT), Monday, February 7, 2005)
(Embargoed Until: 3 P.M. (CT), Monday, February 7, 2005)
Please Note: The FOR THE MEDIA Web site now has a search feature to enable media to find previous JAMA/Archives news releases on specific medical topics. This search feature link is located on the home page at www.jamamedia.org
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 3 P.M. (CT), MONDAY, February 7, 2005
To contact Marla Eisenberg, Sc.D., M.P.H., call Molly Portz at 612-625-2640.
PARENTS HAVE COMPLEX OPINIONS ABOUT NOTIFICATION LAWS FOR MINORS' ACCESS TO CONTRACEPTION
CHICAGOMost parents surveyed felt laws requiring parental notification of minors requesting prescribed contraceptives were a good idea, while almost half viewed a minor's right to obtain contraceptives without parental consent as a good idea, according to an article in the February issue of the Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives journals.
"Since 2000, more than a dozen states have considered repealing or modifying laws that allow minors to consent to reproductive or other health care or have considered restricting access to confidential care for minors," according to background information in the article. Although health care professionals encourage young people to include their parents in such decision making, many organizations feel legal barriers should not obstruct treatment, when considering potential health risks if patients are unable to obtain reproductive services.
Marla E. Eisenberg, Sc.D., M.P.H., from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, and colleagues used data from telephone surveys of 1,068 parents of children aged 13 to 17 years. Survey participants were asked whether or not they thought it was a good idea that people aged 17 years or younger could obtain contraceptive or birth control without a parent's consent. Participants were also asked if they thought a law should exist that requires parental notification when a teen requests birth control from a clinic. The majority of those surveyed were white (88.5 percent), female (67.8 percent), and aged 40 to 49 years (65.8 percent).
The researchers found that more than half (55.1 percent) of the parents thought parental notification laws (PNLs) were a good idea. However, 96.1 percent of participants anticipated at least one negative consequence resulting from such laws, like teens having more unprotected sex, and nearly half (47.6 percent) expected five or more negative consequences. For exceptions to PNLs, 85.5 percent of parents supported at least one, and 29.7 percent supported five to six, with the most commonly supported exception including cases in which an adolescent was abused or involved in incest (67.6 percent). Few parents (15.4 percent) felt teenagers would have less sex if PNLs existed, with even fewer parents (3.6 percent) believing the laws would cause teenagers to stop having sex altogether.
"Although parents may intellectually recognize the need for adolescents to have access to confidential care, support for PNLs may arise from other factors such as fear of unknown others making decisions about their children's health, the desire to monitor their children's activities, and global beliefs about the appropriate role or parents," the authors write. "Educating parents about the potential negative consequences of parental notification could change their support of PNLs."
(Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:120-125. Available post-embargo at archpediatrics.com)
Editor's Note: This study was supported in part by a grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta; a project from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Resources, Rockville, Md.; and a grant from Title X Office of Family Planning, Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Rockville.
For more information, contact JAMA/Archives media relations at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or e-mail mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org.
Go back to the top.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 3 P.M. (CT), MONDAY, February 7, 2005
To contact Gregory D. Zimet, Ph.D., call Mary Hardin at 317-274-7722.
PARENTS COMFORTABLE WITH THE IDEA OF VACCINATION FOR SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS FOR THEIR ADOLESCENT CHILDREN
CHICAGOParents are generally accepting of the hypothetical scenario of vaccinating their adolescent children against infection, whether the infection is sexually transmitted or not, according to a study in the February issue of the Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives journals.
Several vaccines for the prevention of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are in development, according to background information in the article. Because an ideal STI immunization program would target young adolescents and preadolescents before they become sexually active, much of the decision-making burden would be placed on parents. It has been suggested that pediatricians may be reluctant to recommend STI vaccination in anticipation of negative parental reactions.
Gregory D. Zimet, Ph.D., from Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, and his colleagues analyzed the responses of 278 parents to questionnaires to evaluate how their willingness to vaccinate their children related to four possible variables: mode of transmission, whether the infection was sexually transmitted or not; severity of the infection, whether the infection was curable, chronic or fatal; vaccine efficacy, 50, 70 or 90 percent effective; and whether or not a behavioral method for prevention was available (for example, hand washing or condom use).
Parents were as willing to vaccinate their children against STIs as other types of infection (81.3 versus 80.0 on the study's rating scale), the researchers found. The most important determinants for parents in making their decision were the severity of the infection and the vaccine's effectiveness. Parents favored vaccines for infections that had no methods of behavioral prevention available.
"...Most parents are focused on protecting their children's health and not so concerned about the source of infection," the authors concluded. "Clearly, the severity of disease and the efficacy of the vaccine were much more salient dimensions to these parents than were sexual transmissibility….If these findings are replicated in other samples of parents, it will be important to inform pediatricians and other physicians and nurses that most parents will be likely to accept recommendations regarding STI vaccination."
(Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:132-137. Available post-embargo at archpediatrics.com)
Editor's Note: This study was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Md.
EDITORIAL: PARENTAL ACCEPTABILITY OF VACCINES FOR SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS
In an editorial accompanying this study, Susan L. Rosenthal, Ph.D., Lawrence R. Stanberry, M.D., Ph.D., from the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, write that "vaccines have great promise for the reduction of transmission of STIs." Vaccines for some STIs may be on the market soon and "parents will be the key decision makers about vaccine acceptance for adolescents."
"We must continue to examine (1) characteristics of vaccines that influence decision making; (2) how parents and adolescents process information both about the diseases and the vaccines; (3) characteristics of parents and adolescents associated with vaccine acceptance, and (4) barriers to vaccination. The findings from such research will facilitate the development of educational programs, strategies for dissemination, and the creation of policies necessary to reduce barriers."
Vaccination will only be effective if it is taken up widely, the editorial authors added. "Thus, it will take a body of research on STI vaccine acceptance, such as that being conducted by Zimet et al, to ensure that once STI vaccines are available we can maximize uptake by parents and health care professionals of adolescents," they concluded.
(Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:190-192. Available post-embargo at archpediatrics.com)
For more information, contact JAMA/Archives media relations at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or e-mail mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org.
Go back to the top.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 3 P.M. (CT), MONDAY, February 7, 2005
To contact Mark Schuster, M.D., Ph.D., call Warren Robak at 310-451-6913.
HIV-INFECTED PARENTS REPORT LIMITING PHYSICAL CONTACT WITH THEIR CHILDREN
CHICAGOOver one-fourth of HIV-infected parents reported avoiding certain physical interactions, like hugging or kissing, with their children due to a fear of transmitting the disease or of contracting an infection from them, according to an article in the February issue of the Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives journals.
Of adults receiving care for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the U.S., 28 percent have children younger than 18 years old, according to background information in the article. These children, although not infected themselves, may be greatly affected by the disease. Because HIV patients can both transmit the virus and may be vulnerable to opportunistic infections (occurring in people with weakened immune systems), a fear of infection may affect parent-child interactions.
Mark A. Schuster, M.D., Ph.D., from RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., and colleagues conducted interviews with 344 parents receiving health care for HIV in the U.S. Participants were asked how much they feared getting an infection from their children and how much they feared transmitting HIV to their child. They were then asked how much these fears led them to avoid interactions with their children including cuddling or hugging, kissing on the cheek, kissing on the lips, and sharing utensils.
The researchers found that 36.1 percent of HIV-infected patients felt at least "a little" fear and 19 percent felt moderate fear of transmitting HIV to their children. Fourteen percent of parents reported at least a moderate fear and 41.7 percent reported at least "a little" fear of catching infections from their children. Of participants, 27.9 percent avoided one of four types of interaction with their children "a lot," specifically, kissing on the lips (22.2 percent), sharing utensil (17.7 percent), hugging (1.8 percent), and kissing on the cheek (1.3 percent). Nearly 40 percent of parents reported avoiding these interactions at least "a little."
"The finding that more than one third of parents fear transmitting HIV to their children suggests that more work needs to be done to reassure parents about the limited transmissibility of HIV," the authors write. "Although it is encouraging that parents rarely withheld interactions that did not involve the potential exchange of saliva, it is concerning that more than one quarter of parents restricted interactions 'a lot' because of fears of contagion."
(Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:173-179. Available post-embargo at archpediatrics.com)
Editor's Note: This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Child Health & Human Development, Rockville, Md., and a grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta. Original data collection was supported in part by cooperative agreement from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville.
For more information, contact JAMA/Archives media relations at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or e-mail mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org.
Go back to the top.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 3 P.M. (CT), MONDAY, February 7, 2005
To contact Peter J. Schmidt, M.D., call Jules Asher at 301-443-4536.
OVER-THE-COUNTER SUPPLEMENT APPEARS EFFECTIVE IN TREATMENT OF MIDLIFE-ONSET DEPRESSION
CHICAGOThe over-the-counter hormonal therapy known as DHEA may be an effective treatment of midlife-onset minor and major depression, according to a study in the February issue of the Archives of General Psychiatry, one of the JAMA/Archives journals. DHEA (dehydroepiandrosterone), an adrenal androgen and neurosteroid is available as a supplement in the U.S.
Complementary and alternative medicine is a multimillion dollar industry, reflecting a growing number of people who avoid traditional medication, including anti-depressants, according to information provided in the article. Alternative therapies may have potential as second- or third-line treatments but controlled evaluations of these potential therapeutic agents are needed, the study's authors suggested. DHEA has been previously reported to have antidepressant-like effects. The current study was designed to evaluate DHEA as a treatment for depression with a midlife onset.
Peter J. Schmidt, M.D., from the Behavioral Endocrinology Branch of the National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, Md. and colleagues, evaluated 23 men and 23 women aged 45 to 65 with midlife onset major or minor depression of moderate severity. They were randomly assigned to either receive six weeks of DHEA therapy, three weeks each of two dosages, or six weeks of placebo treatment. Following the six weeks of DHEA therapy and a period of one or two weeks without any therapy, the treatment groups were reversed. The participants in the study were evaluated at three and six weeks during the treatment phases with standard measures of depression and a sexual functioning scale.
A 50 percent or greater reduction in the baseline of their score on a depression rating scale was observed in 23 patients after DHEA and in 13 patients after placebo. Six weeks of DHEA treatment was associated with significant improvements in measures of depression and sexual functioning compared to both baseline and six weeks of placebo treatment, the researchers found.
In conclusion the authors write, "At present, there are no predictors of response, and with a 50 percent response rate one would obviously select more reliable first-line treatments for this condition. However, in the 50 percent of depressed outpatients who do not respond to first-line antidepressant treatment, or in those unwilling to take traditional antidepressants, DHEA may have a useful role in the treatment of mild to moderately severe midlife-onset major and minor depression."
(Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:154-162. Available post-embargo at archgenpsychiatry.com)
For more information, contact JAMA/Archives media relations at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or e-mail mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org.
Go back to the top.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 3 P.M. (CT), MONDAY, February 7, 2005
To contact Julia Kim-Cohen, Ph.D., email: julia.kim{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk.
MOTHER'S DEPRESSION ASSOCIATED WITH INCREASED RISK OF CHILD'S ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR
CHICAGOSignificantly higher levels of antisocial behavior were found in seven-year-old children whose mothers were depressed during the child's first five years of life, according to an article in the February issue of the Archives of General Psychiatry, one of the JAMA/Archives journals.
"Children of depressed mothers have elevated conduct problems, presumably because maternal depression disrupts the caregiving environment," according to background information in the article. Researchers have identified three possible explanations for the association between a mother's depression and antisocial behavior (ASB) in their children: 1) depressed women are likely to have antisocial personality traits related to depression, 2) are likely to bear children with antisocial men, 3) and the children of depressed mothers may inherit a genetic predisposition for antisocial disorders.
Julia Kim-Cohen, Ph.D., from King's College London, and colleagues investigated the association between maternal depression and children's ASB. Participants were members of the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study, which examined how genetic and environmental factors affected the development of 1,116 sets of twins in England and Wales. The mothers categorized the timing of their depression as: never depressed (n = 728), depressed only before twins' birth (n = 68), depressed only after twins' birth (n = 193), and depressed before and after twins' birth (n = 124). Children's ASB at ages five and seven was determined from mother and teacher reports.
The researchers found that children of mothers who were depressed during the child's first five years of life had significantly higher ASB levels at seven years of age. A mother's depression taking place after the children's birth was associated with children's ASB, although depression before the children's birth was not. Maternal depression combined with symptoms of antisocial personality disorder in mothers posed the greatest risk for children's ASB.
"We found that familial liability for ASB accounted for approximately one third of the observed association between maternal depression and children's ASB," the authors write. "However, our findings also suggested that children exposed to maternal depression were significantly likely to have conduct problems through a risk process that operates environmentally over any contributions of their parents' antisocial personality."
(Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:173-181. Available post-embargo at archgenpsychiatry.com)
Editor's Note: This study was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health Training Program in Emotion Research, Bethesda, Md. (Dr. Kim-Cohen), and a Royal Society-Wolfson Research Merit Award (Dr. Moffit, co-author). The E-Risk Study is funded by a grant from the UK Medical Research Council, London.
For more information, contact JAMA/Archives media relations at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or e-mail mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org.
Go back to the top.