JAMA & ARCHIVES
JAMA & Archives
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  EMBARGOED CONTENT  PAST ISSUES  EVENTS  HELP  SEARCH RELEASES


June 6, 2005

JAMA news releases are made available to the public after 3 pm US Central time on the first 4 Tuesdays of each month. The Archives Journals news releases are made available to the public after 3 pm Central time on Mondays. We also provide a list of previous news releases.

THIS WEEK'S CONTENTS

ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY NEWS RELEASES

(Embargoed Until: 3 P.M. (CT), Monday, June 6, 2005)

>   PREVALENCE AND SEVERITY OF MENTAL ILLNESS IN THE UNITED STATES

>   LIFETIME PREVALENCE AND AGE OF ONSET OF MENTAL ILLNESS IN THE UNITED STATES

>   LONG DELAYS COMMON BETWEEN AGE OF ONSET AND FIRST TREATMENT OF MENTAL DISORDERS IN THE U.S.

>   MANY INDIVIDUALS WITH MENTAL DISORDERS MAY BE UNTREATED OR POORLY

ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE NEWS RELEASES

(Embargoed Until: 3 P.M. (CT), Monday, June 6, 2005)

>   PERCEPTIONS OF WEIGHT APPEAR TO BE A MORE IMPORTANT RISK FACTOR FOR SUICIDAL BEHAVIOR IN ADOLESCENTS THAN ACTUAL BODY WEIGHT  

>   RESETTLING THE "LOST BOYS OF SUDAN" IN THE UNITED STATES  

>   HOUSING SUBSIDIES MAY HELP PREVENT CHILDREN'S UNDERNUTRITION  

INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THESE NEWS RELEASES IS PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT. JOURNAL ATTRIBUTION IS REQUIRED.

JOURNALISTS CAN NOW ACCESS EMBARGOED JAMA/ARCHIVES STUDIES ON-LINE. Go to www.jamamedia.org for more information and to apply for access.

Please Note: The FOR THE MEDIA Web site now has a search feature to enable media to find previous JAMA/Archives news releases on specific medical topics. This search feature link is located on the home page at www.jamamedia.org

Related Studies: Four related studies, based on data from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication, appear in the June issue of Archives of General Psychiatry.

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 3 P.M. (CT), MONDAY, June 6, 2005
Media Advisory: To contact the studies' authors, Ronald C. Kessler, Ph.D., and Philip S. Wang, M.D., Dr.P.H., call John Lacey at 617-432-0442. To contact editorial authors, Thomas R. Insel, M.D., and Wayne S. Fenton, M.D., call N.I.M.H. press office at 301-443-4536.

RELATED STUDIES

Four related studies, based on data from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication, appear in the June issue of Archives of General Psychiatry.

PREVALENCE AND SEVERITY OF MENTAL ILLNESS IN THE UNITED STATES

CHICAGO—Over the course of the previous 12 months, more than one-fourth of adults reported having symptoms that would qualify them for a diagnosis of a mental disorder; and most of those disorders can be classified as serious or moderate, according to a study in the June issue of the Archives of General Psychiatry, one of the JAMA/Archives journals.

Although previous epidemiological surveys have estimated prevalence of mental disorders in the U.S. as high as 30 percent, information on severity and comorbidity (individuals with symptoms that meet criteria for two or more mental disorders at the same time) has not previously been available, according to background information in the article.

Ronald C. Kessler, Ph.D., of Harvard Medical School, and colleagues analyzed information on mental disorders in the United States collected from the U.S. National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R), a nationally representative face-to-face household survey conducted between February 2001 and April 2003 using the World Health Organization World Mental Health Survey Initiative version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. The researchers determined the 12-month prevalence of different types of mental disorders (the percentage of individuals reported having symptoms that would represent a particular mental disorder in the course of the previous 12 months) as well as the level of severity of the disorder in that 12-month period and the likelihood that an individual qualifying in that 12-month period for a diagnosis for one mental disorder would also meet the criteria for at least one other (comorbidity).

The disorders were divided into four classes: anxiety disorders, including panic disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder; mood disorders, including major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder; impulse control disorder, including oppositional defiant disorder, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and intermittent explosive disorder; and substance abuse disorder, defined as alcohol and drug abuse and dependence. Severity was divided into three levels: serious, which might be defined by criteria including a serious suicide attempt or substantial work limitations as result of the disorder; moderate, which might defined by criteria including suicide ideation or substance abuse without serious impairment of functioning; and mild.

Based on data obtained from 9,282 adult respondents to the survey, the researchers determined that the 12-month prevalence for any disorder was 26.2 percent, with a 12-month prevalence of anxiety disorders of 18.1 percent; mood disorders, 9.5 percent; impulse control disorders, 8.9 percent and substance abuse disorders, 3.8 percent. Of the cases, 22.3 percent were classified as serious; 37.3 percent as moderate and 40.4 percent as mild. Fifty-five percent of individuals with a disorder met the criteria for only one disorder, 22 percent for two diagnoses and 23 percent for three or more diagnoses.

"Although mental disorders are widespread, serious cases are concentrated among a relatively small proportion of cases with high comorbidity," the authors conclude.
(
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:617-627. Available post-embargo at archgenpsychiatry.com)

Editor's Note: The National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R) is supported by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institute of Drug Abuse, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Bethesda, Md., the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, N.J., and John W. Alden Trust, Boston. See the paper for complete funding information.

For more information, contact JAMA/Archives media relations at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or e-mail mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org.

Go back to the top.


LIFETIME PREVALENCE AND AGE OF ONSET OF MENTAL ILLNESS IN THE UNITED STATES

Ronald C. Kessler, Ph.D., of Harvard Medical School, and colleagues determined that about half of Americans reported having symptoms that would qualify them for a diagnosis of a mental disorder over the course of their lifetime (lifetime prevalence), with most mental illness beginning in childhood or adolescence, based on their analysis of data from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). Lifetime prevalence for the different classes of disorders were: anxiety disorder, 28.8 percent; mood disorders, 20.8 percent; impulse-control disorders, 24.8 percent; substance use disorders, 14.6 percent and lifetime prevalence for any disorder, 46.4 percent. Median age of onset is much earlier for anxiety and impulse-control disorders (11 years for both) than for substance use (20 years) and mood disorders (30 years), the researchers found. Half of all lifetime cases start by age 14 years and three fourths by age 24 years.

"...the NCS-R results clearly document that mental disorders are highly prevalent, that lifetime prevalence is, if anything, underestimated, that age-of-onset distribution for most of the disorders considered herein are concentrated in a relatively narrow age range during the first two decades of life, and that later onset disorders occur in large part as temporally secondary comorbid conditions," the authors conclude. "Given the enormous personal and societal burdens of mental disorders, these observations should lead us to direct a greater part of our thinking about public health interventions to the child and adolescent years and, with appropriately balanced considerations of potential risks and benefits, to focus on early interventions aimed at preventing the progression of primary disorders and the onset of comorbid disorders."
(
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:593-602. Available post-embargo at archgenpsychiatry.com)

Editor's Note: The National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R) is supported by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institute of Drug Abuse, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, Md., the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, N.J., and John W. Alden Trust, Boston. See the paper for complete funding information.

For more information, contact JAMA/Archives media relations at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or e-mail mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org.

Go back to the top.


LONG DELAYS COMMON BETWEEN AGE OF ONSET AND FIRST TREATMENT OF MENTAL DISORDERS IN THE U.S.

Philip S. Wang, M.D., Dr.P.H., of Harvard Medical School, and colleagues determined that failure to make prompt initial treatment contact for mental health care is common in the United States, based on their analysis of data from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). The researchers found that the vast majority of people with lifetime disorders eventually make treatment contact, particularly for those with mood disorders. Delay in making treatment contact ranges from six to eight years for mood disorders and nine to 23 years for anxiety disorders.

"...the findings reported here suggest that more effort is needed to increase prompt initial treatment contacts among people with incident episodes of mental disorders," the authors write. "Additional large-scale public education programs ...and expanded use of National Screening Days continue to hold great promise for hastening detection and treatment. ...Interventions to speed initial treatment contact are likely to reduce the burdens and hazards of untreated mental disorder."
(
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:603-613. Available post-embargo at archgenpsychiatry.com)

Editor's Note: The National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R) is supported by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institute of Drug Abuse, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, Md., the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, N.J., and John W. Alden Trust, Boston. See the paper for complete funding information.

For more information, contact JAMA/Archives media relations at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or e-mail mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org.

Go back to the top.


MANY INDIVIDUALS WITH MENTAL DISORDERS MAY BE UNTREATED OR POORLY

Philip S. Wang, M.D., Dr.P.H., of Harvard Medical School, and colleagues determined that only 41.1 percent of individuals with symptoms that qualify them for a diagnosis of a mental disorder in the previous 12 month period (12-month prevalence) were likely to receive any treatment, based on their analysis of data from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). Of those who received treatment, 12.3 percent were treated by a psychiatrist, 16 percent by another mental health specialist, 22.8 percent by a general practitioner, 8.1 percent by a human services professional and 6.8 percent by a complementary or alternative medical provider. More patients in specialty than general medical treatment received treatment that exceeded a minimal threshold of adequacy. "Unmet need for treatment is greatest in traditionally underserved groups, including elderly persons, racial-ethnic minorities, those with low incomes, those without insurance, and residents of rural areas," the authors write.

"Three broad types of intervention are suggested by the results," the authors conclude. "First, outreach efforts are needed to increase access to and initiation of treatments. ... Second, interventions are needed to improve the quality of care delivered to patients with mental disorders. ...Third, initiatives are needed to increase the uptake of successful programs and treatment models. Widespread failure to disseminate proved interventions may, in fact, explain why large unmet needs persist in the United States, despite earlier efforts to address this problem."
(
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:629-640. Available post-embargo at archgenpsychiatry.com)

Editor's Note: The National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R) is supported by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institute of Drug Abuse, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, Md., the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, N.J., and John W. Alden Trust, Boston. See the paper for complete funding information.


EDITORIAL: PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
It's Not Just About Counting Anymore

In an editorial accompanying these studies, Thomas R. Insel, M.D., Director, and Wayne S. Fenton, M.D., Associate Director for Clinical Affairs, of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), write that NIMH supported population-based efforts in psychiatric epidemiology over the last two decades have "demonstrated that mental disorders were highly prevalent in the general population and placed mental illness squarely on the nation's and the world's public health agenda. ...Nonetheless, many critical issues were not addressed by earlier studies."

"The findings reported here are the first fruit of what promises to be a bountiful harvest; the NCS-R is one element in a coordinated program of new psychiatric epidemiological studies that will be completed over the next several years," the authors state. "Quantifying the prevalence of mental disorders, the disabilities associated with them, and the adequacy of service provision forms the foundation for national and international mental health policy. But psychiatric epidemiology is no longer just about counting. The NCS-R results will yield much-needed information about the burden of disease, medical comorbidity, and global patterns of illness. Because it includes subthreshold diagnostic information, which we know from studies of hypertension and diabetes can be highly predictive of future diseases, the results may be informative for studying the effect of early intervention."
(Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:590-592. Available post-embargo at archgenpsychiatry.com)

For more information, contact JAMA/Archives media relations at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or e-mail mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org.

Go back to the top.


EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 3 P.M. (CT), MONDAY, June 6, 2005
Media Advisory: To contact Danice K. Eaton, Ph.D., call Anita Blankenship at 770-488-5131. To contact editorial author, Alain Joffe, M.D., M.P.H., call Staci Vernick Goldberg at 410-516-4958.

PERCEPTIONS OF WEIGHT APPEAR TO BE A MORE IMPORTANT RISK FACTOR FOR SUICIDAL BEHAVIOR IN ADOLESCENTS THAN ACTUAL BODY WEIGHT

CHICAGO—How adolescents perceive their body weight may be more important than their actual weight in terms of increased likelihood of suicidal thoughts and attempts, according to a study in the June issue of the Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives journals.

The percentage of U.S. adolescents who are overweight has tripled during the past 20 years, from five percent in 1980 to 15 percent by 2000, according to background information in the article. Negative mental health outcomes are the most widespread health consequence associated with overweight and obesity in adolescents. Adolescents, particularly girls, who are overweight are at increased risk for considering suicide and suicide attempts. However, it is unclear whether one's actual weight or one's perception of body weight is a more important risk factor for suicidal behavior.

Danice K. Eaton, Ph.D., from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, and colleagues used data from the 2001 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) to determine how body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) and perceived weight were associated with thoughts of suicide and suicide attempts in adolescents. Study participants (n = 13,601) were in grades nine through 12 from a national sample of schools. Students were asked whether they would describe their weight as very underweight, slightly underweight, about the right weight, slightly overweight, or very overweight. They were also asked whether they had seriously considered attempting suicide during the past 12 months, and how many times they had actually attempted suicide in the past 12 months.

The researchers found that the prevalence of self-reported suicidal ideation (i.e., seriously considering suicide in the past 12 months) was 14.2 percent for males and 23.6 percent for females, whereas the self-reported prevalence of attempting suicide in the past 12 months was 6.2 percent for males and 11.2 percent for females. When perceived weight was not taken into account, BMI was associated with suicidal ideation, with the odds of suicidal ideation greater among students who were underweight or overweight compared to those of normal weight. However, once perceived weight was taken into account, there no longer was an association between BMI and suicidal ideation but there was an association between perceived weight and suicidal ideation. Compared to students who perceived themselves as about the right weight, those who saw themselves as very underweight, slightly underweight, slightly overweight, or very overweight had a greater likelihood of suicidal thoughts. Similarly, among white and Hispanic students, BMI was associated with suicide attempts when perceived weight was not taken into account, but there was no longer an association between BMI and suicide attempts when perceived weight was taken into account. White students who perceived themselves as very underweight or very overweight were more likely to have attempted suicide compared to those who perceived themselves as about the right weight. Black and Hispanic students who perceived themselves as very underweight were more likely to have attempted suicide compared to those who perceived themselves as about the right weight.

The author's write "Our results suggest that, regardless of actual BMI, students with extreme perceptions of body size are at increased risk for suicide ideation and suicide attempts, though important racial/ethnic differences exist."
(
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:513-519. Available post-embargo at archpediatrics.com)

EDITORIAL: WHEN PERCEPTION IS REALITY

In an accompanying editorial, Alain Joffe, M.D., M.P.H., from Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, discusses the role perception plays in how individuals behave in managing their health.

"In this issue of Archives, Danice Eaton et al examine the role of body mass index (BMI) and perceived weight in relation to suicide ideation and suicide attempts among adolescents," Dr. Joffe writes. "Their results are timely, not only because of the growing epidemic of obesity in our country and its potential impact on the health of young people, but also because it underscores the importance of considering the role perception plays in the health of adolescents."

"As Eaton et al write, we need to know more about how adolescents develop their perceptions of body size. What is the explanation for the fact that almost 72 percent of females in their study had a normal BMI, yet approximately 12 percent and 37 percent considered themselves underweight or overweight, respectively? Do they receive subtle or not so subtle cues from peers and parents?" the editorialist asks. "In one prospective study, girls who read magazines targeted to them at least weekly were more likely to develop an eating disorder over the ensuing 18 months compared to girls who read such magazines less than weekly."

"What are the most effective methods for correcting adolescent misperceptions about various risky behaviors without scaring them needlessly or deterring them from taking health-promoting risks?" Dr. Joffe writes.
(Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:592-593. Available post-embargo at archpediatrics.com)

For more information, contact JAMA/Archives media relations at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or e-mail mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org.

Go back to the top.


EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 3 P.M. (CT), MONDAY, June 6, 2005
Media Advisory: To contact Paul L. Geltman, M.D., call Gina DiGravio at 617-638-8491.

RESETTLING THE "LOST BOYS OF SUDAN" IN THE UNITED STATES

CHICAGO—Although young unaccompanied Sudanese refugees settling in the United States have done well in general, they may have behavioral and emotional problems in their personal and home life, according to a study in the June issue of the Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives journals.

Refugee children who are not accompanied by parents or family members when resettled in other countries seem to be at particularly high risk for symptoms of emotional distress related to their experiences with violence, according to background information in the article. In 2000, the U.S. began the resettlement of unaccompanied minors from a Kenyan refugee camp, a group called the "Lost Boys of Sudan" by the news media. As very young children in the Sudan in the 1980s, they had been forced to flee their burning villages as their parents and families were often killed. Seeking shelter in Ethiopia, an estimated 25,000 children trekked hundreds of miles across the savannah and desert, stalked by hyenas and lions. Expelled by force from Ethiopia in 1991, they fled to Kenya, fording rivers in which many drowned or were killed by crocodiles.

Paul L. Geltman, M.D., of Boston University School of Medicine, and colleagues assessed the functional and behavioral health of the unaccompanied Sudanese refugee minors approximately one year after resettlement in the United States. A sample of the refugees in foster care were interviewed using questionnaires, adapted from standardized questionnaires using feedback from foster parents, resettlement program staff and the children themselves, to assess trauma, coping and quality of life.

Of the 304 individuals who returned questionnaires, most had directly witnessed or were victims of war-related violence. Ninety-three percent of the youths reported that their villages had been attacked; many reported witnessing close friends or family members being tortured, injured or killed; 20 percent reported being tortured themselves. Although many of the children said they were at least a little comfortable with U.S. society and culture in general, many also expressed a desire for more detailed and ongoing orientation in social and cultural issues both before and after coming to the U.S.

The youths scored well on measures related to functioning at school and with peers. They tended to score less well on measures of general and mental health, family activities and family cohesion. A number of factors were associated with increased risk of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the youths, including separation from immediate family, direct personal injury and head trauma. Experiences in the U.S. that increased risk of post-traumatic stress disorder included living in a group home or being in foster care alone with an American family, feeling lonely or isolated and less participation in group activities. Feeling safe at home and at school reduced the risk of post-traumatic stress disorder. "This suggests that relative levels of family and community engagement after arriving in the United States may mediate the ultimate impact of early trauma on later psychosocial functioning," the authors write.

"The Sudanese minors seemed to function well in school and activities outside the home," the authors conclude. "However, problems emerge in their home lives and emotional states, as evidenced by low scores on the CHQ [Child Health Questionnaire] family and mental health subscales. This finding suggests that the criteria used to assess the 'success' of resettlement programs should include broader measures of household or family life and emotional well-being. In this manner, the findings of this study outline not only the promise and challenges of resettling refugee children but also the important opportunities for innovative social service and health care interventions. As such, a comprehensive approach could help ensure that future cohorts of unaccompanied refugee minors in the United States will reach their full psychological and physical potential to live full and vibrant lives."
(
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:585-591. Available post-embargo at archpediatrics.com)

Editor's Note: This study was funded by the Joel and Barbara Alpert Endowment for the Children of the City, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston.

For more information, contact JAMA/Archives media relations at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or e-mail mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org.

Go back to the top.


EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 3 P.M. (CT), MONDAY, June 6, 2005
Media Advisory: To contact Alan Meyers, M.D., M.P.H., call Gina DiGravio at 617-638-8491.

HOUSING SUBSIDIES MAY HELP PREVENT CHILDREN'S UNDERNUTRITION

CHICAGO—The children of low-income families who receive public housing rent subsidies had greater weight for age, an indicator of better nutrition, than children whose families did not receive rent subsidies, according to a study in the June issue of the Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives journals.

Poor families in the United States are increasingly unable to afford basic necessities, including food and shelter, according to background information in the article. Household food insecurity, defined as a household with limited or uncertain availability of enough food for an active healthy life, affects children's health and well-being. Poor families who receive housing subsidies may be protected from excessive pressure on their food budget compared to comparable poor families without subsidies, the authors suggest. The current study tested whether the nutritional status of low-income children, as measured by growth parameters (weight for age) and health status would be better among children whose families received housing subsidies.

Alan Meyers, M.D., M.P.H., of the Boston Medical Center, and colleagues assessed data from the Children's Sentinel Nutritional Assessment Program, which interviewed caregivers of children younger than three years in pediatric clinics and emergency departments in six sites, Arkansas, California, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota and Washington, D.C. The child's weight was recorded at the time of the interview, which collected data including information on the family, the child's health, the U.S. Household Food Security Scale and public assistance participation.

Using data for 11,723 children of families who lived in rented housing and were identified as low-income, the researchers found that children of food-insecure families not receiving housing subsides had lower weight for age compared with children in food-insecure families receiving housing subsidies. "The importance of this measure derives both from its value as a public health indicator of nutritional and health status in populations of young children and from evidence that undernutrition in early childhood causes increased susceptibility to infectious disease as well as concurrent delayed mental development and later poor school performance and reduced intellectual capacity," the authors write.

"The federal budget for low-income housing assistance has been targeted for reduction. From a public health perspective, the findings of the current study raise concerns about the impact on child well-being of these proposed reductions," the authors conclude. "Our results suggest that in a time of increasing economic hardship and food insecurity for American families, decreases in housing subsidies may further compromise the nutritional status of low-income children."
(
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:551-556. Available post-embargo at archpediatrics.com)

Editor's Note: Please see article for complete funding information.

For more information, contact JAMA/Archives media relations at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or e-mail mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org.

Go back to the top.

HOME | EMBARGOED CONTENT | PAST ISSUES | EVENTS | HELP | SEARCH RELEASES
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.