JAMA news releases are made available to the public after 3 pm US Central time on the first 4 Tuesdays of each month. The Archives Journals news releases are made available to the public after 3 pm Central time on Mondays. We also provide a list of previous news releases.
THIS WEEK'S CONTENT
JAMA NEWS RELEASES
(Embargoed for Release: 3 p.m. CT, Tuesday, January 11, 2005)
JAMA NEWS RELEASES
LONG-TERM HIGH CONSUMPTION OF RED AND PROCESSED MEAT LINKED WITH INCREASED RISK FOR COLON CANCER
ELEVATED GLUCOSE LEVELS AND DIABETES ARE ASSOCIATED WITH INCREASED RISK FOR CANCER
SOME U.S. SOLDIERS RETURNING FROM AFGHANISTAN SHOULD BE SCREENED FOR MALARIA
JAMA REPORT (VIDEO NEWS RELEASE SCRIPT)
LONG-TERM, HIGH CONSUMPTION OF RED AND PROCESSED MEAT LINKED TO 50%
INCREASE IN COLORECTAL CANCER RISK - FISH AND CHICKEN LINKED TO DECREASED RISK
INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THESE NEWS RELEASES IS PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT. JOURNAL ATTRIBUTION IS REQUIRED.
TV Note: This week's JAMA video news release is on meat consumption and the risk of colorectal cancer. The release will be fed Tuesday, January 11, from 9:00 - 9:30 a.m. ET on Intelsat America 6 (formerly Telstar 6), Transponder 11 (C-Band) and from 2:00 - 2:30 p.m. ET on Intelsat America 6, Transponder 11 (C-Band). For more information, call 312/464-JAMA (5262).
JOURNALISTS CAN NOW ACCESS EMBARGOED JAMA/ARCHIVES STUDIES ONLINE
Go to www.jamamedia.org for more information and to apply for access.
Please Note: The FOR THE MEDIA Web site now has a search feature to enable media to find previous JAMA/Archives news releases on specific medical topics. This search feature link is located on the home page at www.jamamedia.org
Embargoed for Release: 3 p.m. CT, TUESDAY, January 11, 2005
Media Advisory: To contact the corresponding author for the first study, Michael J. Thun, M.D., M.S., call Anne Isenhower at 404-417-5850. To contact the corresponding author for the 2nd study, Petra H. M. Peeters, M.D., Ph.D., email: P.H.M.Peeters{at}umcutrecht.nl. To contact the editorialist, Walter C. Willett, M.D., Dr.P.H., call Kevin Myron at 617-432-3952.
LONG-TERM HIGH CONSUMPTION OF RED AND PROCESSED MEAT LINKED WITH INCREASED RISK FOR COLON CANCER
CHICAGOHigh consumption of red and processed meat over a long period of time is associated with an increased risk for a certain type of colon cancer, according to a study in the January 12 issue of JAMA.
Meat consumption has been associated with colorectal cancer in previous studies, but the strength of the association and types of meat involved have not been consistent, according to background information in the article. Few studies have evaluated long-term meat consumption or the relationship between meat consumption and the risk of rectal cancer. Clarifying the role of meat consumption and any subsequent development of colorectal cancer is important because meat is an integral component of diet in the United States and many other countries in which colorectal cancer is common. Per capita annual consumption of beef has increased in the United States since 1993, reversing a previous decrease since 1976.
Ann Chao, Ph.D., of the American Cancer Society, Atlanta, and colleagues examined the relationship between recent and long-term meat consumption and the risk of colon and rectal cancer. The study included 148,610 adults aged 50 to 74 years, residing in 21 states with population-based cancer registries, who provided information on meat consumption in 1982 and again in 1992/1993 when enrolled in the Cancer Prevention Study II (CPS II) Nutrition Cohort. Follow-up from time of enrollment in 1992/1993 through August 31, 2001, identified 1,667 incident colorectal cancers.
The researchers found that high intake of red and processed meat reported in 1992/1993 was associated with higher risk of colon cancer after adjusting for age and energy intake but not after further adjustment for body mass index, cigarette smoking, and other covariates. When long-term consumption was considered, persons in the highest tertile of consumption in both 1982 and 1992/1993 had a 50 percent higher risk of distal colon cancer (a section of the colon near the rectum) associated with processed meat, and those persons with the highest ratio of red meat-to-poultry and fish had a 53 percent increased risk of distal colon cancer, relative to those persons in the lowest tertile at both time points. Long-term consumption of poultry and fish was inversely associated with risk of both proximal and distal colon cancer. High consumption of red meat reported in 1992/1993 was associated with a 71 percent higher risk of rectal cancer, as was high consumption reported in both 1982 and 1992/1993 (43 percent increased risk).
"The main strengths of this study are its size, the availability of dietary and other exposure information collected prospectively from respondents at 2 time points, and information on major potential confounders. The sample size allowed us to obtain stable estimates of risk and to show differences by colorectal subsite. Our results demonstrate the potential value of examining long-term meat consumption in assessing risk and strengthen the evidence that prolonged high consumption of red and processed meat may increase the risk of cancer in the distal portion of the large intestine," the authors conclude.
(JAMA. 2005;293:172-182. Available post-embargo at jama.com)
Editor's Note: For information on the funding of the study, please see the JAMA article.
STUDY FINDS NO REDUCTION IN BREAST CANCER RISK WITH CONSUMPTION OF VEGETABLES AND FRUITS
Contrary to findings in previous studies, new research that includes a large group of women found no link between eating fruits and vegetables and a subsequent decreased risk for breast cancer, according to a study in this week's JAMA.
Carla H. van Gils, Ph.D., of the University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands and colleagues examined how the intake of total and specific vegetable and fruit groups is related to breast cancer risk among participants in the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study, a large prospective collaboration project carried out in 10 European countries. This project, currently including 519,978 individuals, is the largest ever conducted specifically to investigate the relationship between diet and cancer. It includes participants living in countries from the north to the south of Europe, spanning a wide range of vegetable and fruit consumption.
For this study, the researchers examined data from 285,526 women from this group between the ages of 25 and 70 years. Participants completed a dietary questionnaire in 1992-1998 and were followed up for incidence of cancer until 2002.
During follow-up, 3,659 invasive incident breast cancer cases were reported. The researchers found no significant associations between vegetable and fruit intake and breast cancer risk. For 6 specific vegetable subgroups no associations with breast cancer risk were observed either.
"This absence of a protective association was observed among almost all of the participating countries. A protective effect is supported by a vast number of case-control studies. It is possible, however, that the inverse relationships reported from case-control studies may have been overstated, because of recall bias and possibly because early symptoms in patients may have led to a change in dietary habits. In addition, selection bias is a problem in situations where control participation is less than complete because those controls who participate are likely to be more health conscious and consume greater amounts of vegetables and fruits," the authors write. "The advantages of our cohort study are its size and the wide range of vegetable and fruit intake, caused by the inclusion of participants living in countries from the North to the South of Europe."
"...the findings from this study confirm the data from the largest pooled analysis to date, in that no large protective effects for vegetable or fruit intake in relation to breast cancer can be observed. This does not exclude the possibility that protective effects may be observed for specific nutrients or in specific subgroups of women, such as those with a family history of breast cancer or estrogen-receptor positive tumors," the authors conclude.
(JAMA. 2005;293:183-193. Available post-embargo at jama.com)
Editor's Note: For information on the funding of the study, please see the JAMA article.
EDITORIAL: DIET AND CANCER - AN EVOLVING PICTURE
In an accompanying editorial, Walter C. Willett, M.D., Dr.P.H., of the Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, discusses the studies in this week's JAMA on diet and cancer risk.
"Although the overall data for red meat and colon cancer are strongly suggestive of an important relation, they are not conclusive. Further studies with long follow-up, repeated measures of diet, genetic markers of susceptibility, more detailed measures of cooking methods, and molecular characterization of colon cancer cases may be helpful."
"Although recent findings on fruit and vegetable consumption and cancer may be disappointing, reductions in blood pressure and epidemiological evidence for lower risks of cardiovascular disease provide sufficient reason to consume these foods in abundance. The relation between red meat consumption and colorectal cancer may not be conclusive, but prudence would suggest that red meat, and processed meats in particular, should be eaten sparingly to minimize risk."
"When combined with other healthful diet and lifestyle factors, it appears that approximately 70 percent of colon cancer can potentially be avoided. Replacing red meat with a combination of fish, nuts, poultry, and legumes will also reduce risk of coronary heart disease, in part, because some of these foods have positive benefits. This substitution is an important part of the Mediterranean dietary pattern, which improves blood lipids and other metabolic parameters and has been related to lower rates of total mortality. Thus, keeping red meat consumption low is best viewed, not as an isolated goal, but as part of an overall dietary and lifestyle strategy to optimize health and well-being. Fortunately, substituting pistachio-encrusted salmon and gingered brown basmati pilaf for roast beef with mashed potatoes and gravy is not a culinary sacrifice," Dr. Willett writes.
(JAMA. 2005;293:233-234. Available post-embargo at jama.com)
For More Information: Contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations Department at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or email: mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org.
Go back to the top.
 |
Embargoed for Release: 3 p.m. CT, TUESDAY, January 11, 2005
Media Advisory: To contact co-authors Sun Ha Jee, Ph.D., M.H.S., or Jonathan M. Samet, M.D., M.S., call Tim Parsons at 410-955-7619. To contact editorialist Kathleen A. Cooney, M.D., call Nicole Fawcett at 734-764-2220.
ELEVATED GLUCOSE LEVELS AND DIABETES ARE ASSOCIATED WITH INCREASED RISK FOR CANCER
CHICAGONew research involving more than one million people indicates that having high fasting serum glucose levels and diabetes are risk factors for several major cancers, according to a study in the January 12 issue of JAMA.
Diabetes mellitus is a serious and costly disease that is becoming increasingly common in many countries, including Korea, the site of this study, according to background information in the article. Recent data show that approximately 150 million people have diabetes mellitus worldwide, and this number may double by 2025, especially in developing countries, because of population growth, aging, unhealthy diets, obesity, and sedentary lifestyles.
Sun Ha Jee, Ph.D., M.H.S., of the Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea, and colleagues examined the relationship between fasting serum glucose and diabetes and risk of all cancers and specific cancers in men and women in Korea. The 10 year Korean Cancer Prevention Study (KCPS) included 1,298,385 Koreans (829,770 men and 468,615 women) aged 30 to 95 years who received health insurance from the National Health Insurance Corp. and had a biennial medical evaluation in 1992-1995.
During the 10 years of follow-up, there were 20,566 cancer deaths in men and 5,907 cancer deaths in women. The researchers found that, while controlling for smoking and alcohol use, the group with the highest fasting serum glucose (140 mg/dL or greater [7.8 mmol/L or greater]) had a higher death rates from all cancers combined (29 percent higher for men; 23 percent higher for women) compared with the group with the lowest level (less than 90 mg/dL [less than 5.0 mmol/L]). By cancer site, the association was strongest for pancreatic cancer, comparing the highest and lowest stratums (91 percent increased risk in men; more than twice the risk for women). Significant associations were also found for cancers of the esophagus, liver, and colon/rectum in men and of the liver and cervix in women, and there were significant trends with glucose level for cancers of the esophagus, colon/rectum, liver, pancreas, and bile duct in men and of the liver and pancreas in women.
Of the 26,473 total cancer deaths in men and women, 848 were estimated as attributable to having a fasting serum glucose level of more than 90/mg/dL. For cancer incidence, the general patterns reflected those found for mortality. For persons with a diagnosis of diabetes or a fasting serum glucose level greater than 125 mg/dL (6.9 mmol/L), risks for cancer incidence and mortality were generally elevated compared with those without diabetes.
"While the generalizability of the findings is uncertain, we have shown that fasting serum glucose level and diabetes are associated with cancer risk in a population far leaner than the Western populations in other studies. These associations do not reflect confounding by obesity, suggesting that the mechanism of increased cancer risk reflects the consequences of hyperinsulinemia. Glucose intolerance may be one pathway by which obesity increases cancer risk, and rising obesity may increase future cancer rates," the authors write.
(JAMA. 2005;293:194-202. Available post-embargo at jama.com)
Editor's Note: This study was funded by a grant from the National Cancer Institute.
EDITORIAL: HYPERGLYCEMIA, OBESITY, AND CANCER RISKS ON THE HORIZON
In an accompanying editorial, Kathleen A. Cooney, M.D., and Stephen B. Gruber, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H., of the University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, discuss the findings by Jee et al.
"How may these results be interpreted in the context of cancer incidence and mortality in the population? Fortunately, the relative risks are modest and, therefore, the fraction of cancers attributable to elevated fasting glucose in the Korean population is small, in part because of the relatively low prevalence of diabetes in Korea (5 percent)," they write. "Some of these cancer deaths may be preventable, and further studies will be required to demonstrate that reductions in hyperglycemia and diabetes will lead to declines in cancer mortality. This is especially true in light of data from the Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group demonstrating a reduction in the incidence of diabetes through lifestyle interventions, including dietary modification and introduction of a regular exercise routine. Since the hazard ratios reported by Jee et al are derived from a Korean population, they cannot be directly implemented to increase understanding of the population-attributable fraction of cancer that may be due to diabetes in the United States. But since the prevalence of diabetes is higher in the United States than in Korea, it is possible that preventing diabetes may have a more important effect in the United States."
"As diabetes becomes an increasing public health concern in modern societies, the cancer risks looming on the horizon are now being recognized. Strategies to address the emerging epidemics of diabetes and obesity are likely to have a broad impact on public health. Indeed, these approaches may ultimately diminish the burden of cancer for future generations," they conclude.
(JAMA. 2005;293:235-236. Available post-embargo at jama.com)
For More Information: Contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations Department at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or email: mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org.
Go back to the top.
 |
Embargoed for Release: 3 p.m. CT, TUESDAY, January 11, 2005
Media Advisory: To contact corresponding author Bruno P. Petruccelli, M.D., M.P.H., call Ann Ham at 410-436-2088.
SOME U.S. SOLDIERS RETURNING FROM AFGHANISTAN SHOULD BE SCREENED FOR MALARIA
CHICAGONearly 40 U.S. Army Rangers returning from Afghanistan in 2002 may have contracted malaria because of inadequate use of preventive measures, according to a study in the January 12 issue of JAMA.
War and conflict have had a long historical partnership with malarial outbreaks, according to background information in the article. Disruptions in health care infrastructure, maneuvering of numerous military personnel, and exposure of individuals with nominal or no immunity all bring about an increased risk for the disease. Throughout history, disease and nonbattle injuries have caused more casualties than combat action among military personnel, with malaria having a significant impact on many military operations.
U.S. Army soldiers operating in endemic regions are directed to consume antimalaria chemoprophylaxis and use personal protective measures, including minimizing exposed skin through proper wear of the uniform and use of bed nets, impregnating uniforms and bed nets with permethrin, and frequently applying topical insect repellent (33 percent diethyltoluamide [DEET]) to exposed skin.
Russ S. Kotwal, M.D., M.P.H., of the Naval Operational Medicine Institute, Pensacola, Fla., and colleagues conducted a study to determine the extent of malaria in U.S. Army personnel deployed to a combat zone. The unit studied was the 725-man Ranger Task Force that deployed to eastern Afghanistan between June and September 2002.
The researchers found that a total of 38 patients were infected with malaria, yielding an attack rate of 52.4 cases per 1,000 soldiers. Diagnosis was confirmed a median of 233 days (range, 1-339 days) after return from the malaria endemic region, with additional laboratory findings noting anemia and thrombocytopenia (a blood disease).
From an anonymous postdeployment survey of 72 percent (521/725) of the task force, the self-reported compliance rate was 52 percent for weekly chemoprophylaxis, 41 percent for terminal (postdeployment) chemoprophylaxis, 31 percent for both weekly and terminal chemoprophylaxis, 82 percent for treating uniforms with permethrin, and 29 percent for application of insect repellent.
"A major cause of malaria prophylaxis failure is patient nonadherence to prescribed treatment. Providing continuous education about the need to comply with prophylaxis medications and having leaders directly observe therapy and enforce personal protective measures may help safeguard soldiers from vector-borne disease. Additionally, U.S. military and civilian clinicians need to consider malaria in the differential diagnosis for military personnel who return from a malaria-endemic region and present with fever or an otherwise indistinct illness," the authors write.
(JAMA. 2005;293:212-216. Available post-embargo at jama.com)
Editor's Note: No outside funding or support was received for this study.
For More Information: Contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations Department at 312/464-JAMA (5262) or email: mediarelations{at}jama-archives.org.
Go back to the top.
JAMA REPORTS
LONG-TERM, HIGH CONSUMPTION OF RED AND PROCESSED MEAT LINKED TO 50%
INCREASE IN COLORECTAL CANCER RISK - FISH AND CHICKEN LINKED TO
DECREASED RISK
VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Raw hamburgers, cooked steaks, sandwich, cook preparing burgers
AUDIO:
HAMBURGERS, STEAKS, PROCESSED DELI MEATS. AMERICANS LOVE THESE FOODS,
AND EAT LOTS OF THEM.
VIDEO:
SOT/FULL
@: 06
Super: Michael Holmes
Eats Red Meat
Runs :02
AUDIO:
"I eat red meat, ya."
VIDEO:
SOT/FULL
@: 08
Super: Karen Nutt
Eats red meat
Runs :04
AUDIO:
"I do cook a lot of red meat, just because it's easy and it's quick."
VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Woman eating steak
Woman eating gyro
AUDIO:
BUT EATING TOO MUCH RED OR PROCESSED MEAT, SAY ONCE A DAY OR MORE, OVER
MANY YEARS, CAN INCREASE YOUR RISK OF CANCER IN THE COLON OR RECTUM.
VIDEO:
NAT SOT UP FULL FOR :08
Dr. Thun pointing at graphic on computer - close-up on graphic.
AUDIO:
"Most of the association with red meat was in the distal part of the
colon, and much of the association with processed meat was in the
rectum."
VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Dr. Thun and colleagues going over data
Elderly people eating lunch
GFX/JAMA COVER
AUDIO:
DR. MICHAEL THUN (Tune) AND COLLEAGUES AT THE AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY
SURVEYED ABOUT 150-THOUSAND PEOPLE, AGES 50 TO 74, ABOUT THEIR EATING
HABITS AND HEALTH STATUS. STUDY PARTICIPANTS FILLED OUT QUESTIONAIRRES
IN 1982 AND 1992, AND RESEARCHERS FOLLOWED UP ON THEIR HEALTH STATUS
UNTIL 2001. THE FINDINGS APPEAR IN JAMA, THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN
ASSOCIATION.
VIDEO:
SOT/FULL 1:4:26-:37
@:50
Super: Michael Thun, M.D., M.S.
American Cancer Society
Runs :11
AUDIO:
"For people who reported high consumption of red meat and processed meat
on both questionnaires, that is long-term high consumption, we found
about a 50 percent higher risk of colon cancer."
VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Raw beef, Pork dish, lamb on grill
Sliced cold cuts/cooked bacon
Man eating Gyro
Cooked chicken on plate with pasta
Pan of seafood case (raw seafood)
AUDIO:
THE RESEARCHERS DEFINED RED MEAT AS BEEF, PORK AND LAMB, AND PROCESSED
MEAT INCLUDED COLD CUTS AND BACON. HIGH CONSUMPTION MEANT EATING SUCH
FOOD ABOUT NINE TIMES A WEEK. THE STUDY ALSO LOOKED AT CHICKEN AND FISH
CONSUMPTION, AND FOUND SOME GOOD NEWS ABOUT COLON CANCER RISK.
VIDEO:
SOT/FULL
Michael Thun, M.D., M.S.
American Cancer Society
Runs :15
AUDIO:
"The consumption of fish and chicken was related to lower risk and this
was not just a function of displacing red meat in the diet, but it
actually was significantly related to lower risk on its own."
VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Chef cooking fish on grill
AUDIO:
SO EATING MORE CHICKEN AND FISH MAY BE A GOOD THING, ALONG WITH CUTTING
BACK RED MEAT TO ONCE OR TWICE A WEEK.
VIDEO:
SOT/FULL
Michael Thun, M.D., M.S.
American Cancer Society
Runs :11
AUDIO:
"Having a steak to celebrate is not really going to affect your risk of
colon cancer, but if meat is a central component of your diet over a
long period of time, that could well affect your risk."
VIDEO:
B-ROLL
Close up - Raw steak in grocery store
AUDIO:
THIS IS MAVIS PRALL REPORTING.